On 7 Sep 2015 22:31:05 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>>No.
>>Check the archives ("Default System BLKSIZE for PDSE" in Oct 2006)
>>"Partitioned Data Set Extended Usage Guide" (
>>http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246106.html?Open ) Figure 10-32 shows
>>a PDSE created
>What type of dataset? PS, PO, PDSE, ...? The optimal block size for PDSE
>(FB-80, DSNTYPE=LIBRARY) is 32720.
Yes, its about PDSEs. Kind a makes sense, sure. However I have been using PDSEs
for a long time and don't seem to remeber to have seen this. Must have been
blind (meaning I didn't
On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:59:22 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>What type of dataset? PS, PO, PDSE, ...? The optimal block size for PDSE
>>(FB-80, DSNTYPE=LIBRARY) is 32720.
>
>Yes, its about PDSEs. Kind a makes sense, sure. However I have been using
>PDSEs for a long time and don't seem to remeber
On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:59:22 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>What type of dataset? PS, PO, PDSE, ...? The optimal block size for PDSE
>>(FB-80, DSNTYPE=LIBRARY) is 32720.
>
>Yes, its about PDSEs. Kind a makes sense, sure. However I have been using
>PDSEs for a long time and don't seem to remeber
>No.
>Check the archives ("Default System BLKSIZE for PDSE" in Oct 2006)
>"Partitioned Data Set Extended Usage Guide" (
>http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246106.html?Open ) Figure 10-32 shows
>a PDSE created 2004-11-04 with SMS.IND=R (SDB) and block size 32720.
How embarrassing. I
