Re: CLIST but not REXX

2023-03-27 Thread Seymour J Metz
III [li...@akphs.com] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 6:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CLIST but not REXX Bob Bridges wrote, in part: >2) The ability to interact live with subsystems. In CLIST I can start an> FTP session and interact with it, grabbing FTP's responses and de

Re: CLIST but not REXX

2023-03-27 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bob Bridges [robhbrid...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 5:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CLIST but not REXX Three things: 1) As Phil says, more-or-less automatic parsing of keyword and positional

Re: CLIST but not REXX

2023-03-27 Thread Phil Smith III
Bob Bridges wrote, in part: >2) The ability to interact live with subsystems. In CLIST I can start an> FTP session and interact with it, grabbing FTP's responses and deciding on> the fly what command to issue next. In REXX I have to queue up an entire> session, then call FTP and decide afterward

CLIST but not REXX

2023-03-27 Thread Bob Bridges
hat CLIST makes it much easier. --- Steve Thompson wrote, in part: >Oh, I haven't had to deal with it for a while, but as I recall there is >a function that CLIST can do that REXX couldn't (well back in the >1990s). I wonder if that is still true. ---

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-17 Thread Seymour J Metz
ssion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Farley, Peter x23353 [031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 10:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) OK,

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-17 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
OK, I'll bite - what is STTEAM? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 9:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) 1

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Seymour J Metz
, September 16, 2021 8:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) Right, not quite the same thing. I mean, SAY and PULL display a prompt and then fetch a response, alright, but they don't do it on a single

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Seymour J Metz
: Thursday, September 16, 2021 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) For CLIST WRITENR why not use the REXX SAY and then PULL ? Lionel B. Dyck <>< Website: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uSyC-3AIxi

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Seymour J Metz
: Thursday, September 16, 2021 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 08:14:51 -0500, Lionel B. Dyck wrote: >For CLIST WRITENR why not use the REXX SAY and then PULL ? > I don't b

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Seymour J Metz
, 2021 9:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) I can think of three features off-hand: CLIST's PROC statement, of course, offering some convenient ways of interpreting arguments. I've gotten used to doing

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Bob Bridges
Dunno what it's called; that's why I described it the long way :). I've written lots of REXXes that can be called either as a TSO command or an ISPF Edit macro, and vary their behavior depending. Not sure I've ever had one call itself that way. I can see the advantage, though...I think. At

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Bob Bridges
Right, not quite the same thing. I mean, SAY and PULL display a prompt and then fetch a response, alright, but they don't do it on a single line, as WRITENR does. Don’t think I ever noticed CHAROUT. Is that part of TSO REXX? I think I've seen it in Regina. --- Bob Bridges,

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 08:14:51 -0500, Lionel B. Dyck wrote: >For CLIST WRITENR why not use the REXX SAY and then PULL ? > I don't believe that's equivalent. Are you conflating WRITENR and WTOR? But the Rexx analogue of WRITENR is CHAROUT(). On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:02:13 -0400, Bob Bridges

Re: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
" - - - John Wooden -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Bridges Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 8:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?) I can think of thre

What does CLIST have that REXX doesn't? (was Interpret or Value - Which is better?)

2021-09-16 Thread Bob Bridges
Wednesday, September 15, 2021 13:01 There are several things in CLIST that REXX doesn't have. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN