Re: COBOL 4.2 support

Multiple answers in one response... One comment, check the IBMMAIN Archives for discussions on COBOL V5. There= are many changes to the way this compiler runs. For one thing, the output= files need to be PDS/E datasets for the compiler and Load libs. =20 Almost right. The compiler outputs

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

I just did a web search for 'SHARE March 2015 16615' and the 60 page .pdf pops right up in confex.com site. In a message dated 4/23/2015 5:51:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time, tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com writes: If you don't have access to SHARE content, this discussion has reminded me to

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

[005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: 22 April 2015 15:21 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: COBOL 4.2 support Good morning. Does anyone know how much longer COBOL 4.2 will be supported? Mitch Mccluhan mitc...@aol.com

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mitch Mccluhan [005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: 22 April 2015 15:21 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: COBOL 4.2 support Good morning. Does anyone know how

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

] On Behalf Of Mitch Mccluhan Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support ...thanks to all that responded. One last question. Can 4.2 and 5.2 exist together? Does anyone have any experience with this? Mitch Mccluhan mitc

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

22, 2015 8:29 am Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support Did you try this search on www.ibm.com? COBOL LIFECYCLE 4.2 I think you may find this URL http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycleapp/PLCDetail.wss?synkey=B984385H82239E03from=spf Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

] On Behalf Of Mitch Mccluhan Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:22 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: COBOL 4.2 support Good morning. Does anyone know how much longer COBOL 4.2 will be supported? Mitch Mccluhan mitc...@aol.com

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mitch Mccluhan Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support ...thanks to all that responded. One last question. Can 4.2 and 5.2 exist together? Does anyone have any experience

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

@listserv.ua.edu Sent: 22-Apr-15 10:09:15 AM Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support One comment, check the IBMMAIN Archives for discussions on COBOL V5. There are many changes to the way this compiler runs. For one thing, the output files need to be PDS/E datasets for the compiler and Load libs. You cannot

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

-- Original Message -- From: Mitch Mccluhan 005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Sent: 22-Apr-15 10:04:53 AM Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support ...thanks to all that responded. One last question. Can 4.2 and 5.2 exist together? Does anyone have any

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

...@mindspring.com To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Sent: 22-Apr-15 10:07:08 AM Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support I would think so long as they point to unique libraries - yes. Just make sure you have the compatibility maintenance on for LE and COBOL. Read the Migration manual for helpful hints. Lizette

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

) 917.572.7364 (C) d...@bkassociates.net -- Original Message -- From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Sent: 22-Apr-15 2:35:57 PM Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support One quibble. I am pretty certain the V5 output files need not be in PDS/E's. However, yes, any executable

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

Not a UNIX file? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Doug Fuerst Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support According to the docs, you cannot bind

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

I believe you. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Doug Fuerst Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support Not according to the Migration Guide

Re: COBOL 4.2 support

. It needs to be a PDS/E. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL 4.2 support I would think so long

COBOL 4.2 support

Good morning. Does anyone know how much longer COBOL 4.2 will be supported? Mitch Mccluhan mitc...@aol.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with