>As this is an STC, I assume it can run this IRRSEQ00 call numerous times. If
>that is the case, would it make sense to have two ASM programs, and have the
>first (called from COBOL) attach the second, specifying SZERO=NO and have the
>subtask issue the IRRSEQ00 call? By doing it in a subtask,
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of scott Ford
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Cobol - S80A abend
All:
I have a question about error recovery and here is the situation.
1. Cobol STC calls an assembler module which passes
a RACF
>The STC has Region=0M. According to IBM, they are seeing a ton of LSQA
entries and I know the routine doesn't perform 'storage obtains' or
'getmains'.
LSQA is not a place where standard programs *actively* obtain storage, but they
may call some service for which the system has to obtain a
- Original Message -
From: "scott Ford" <idfli...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 7:54:42 AM
Subject: Re: Cobol - S80A abend
All,
The STC has Region=0M. According to IBM, they are seeing a ton of LSQA
entries and I know the routine
All,
The STC has Region=0M. According to IBM, they are seeing a ton of LSQA
entries and I know the routine doesn't perform 'storage obtains' or
'getmains'. I know when COBOL makes the call we initially pass a RACF
command, we then perform until no more messages come back from the call.
But we
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:48:19 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>Using 0M can cause other issues. If the task abends and there is not enough
>below the line storage (usually about 2M is needed) for abend processing,
>strange and fun things can occur.
>
>I prefer to know what is needed and what can
>I have a question about error recovery and here is the situation.
>
>1. Cobol STC calls an assembler module which passes
>a RACF command using IRRSEQ00
>2. The customer has a large profile, over 32K
>3. We are seeing a S80A in 'IRRSEQ00'
>
>Now the question, I know I can write a Cobol Condition
On 2/23/2017 1:36 PM, scott Ford wrote:>
> Now the question, I know I can write a Cobol Condition Handler, but since
> the abend is occurring in an assembler module, can i change the Assembler
> called to do a ESTAE ..? I want to be able to note the S80A abend but
still
> recovery. I am being
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: Steve Beaver <st...@stevebeaver.com>
>Sent: Feb 23, 2017 12:17 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Cobol - S80A abend
>
>Change jobcard to REGION=OM
>
>That usually fixes 99% of the problems
>
>Steve
>
Change jobcard to REGION=OM
That usually fixes 99% of the problems
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of scott Ford
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Cobol - S80A
cott Ford
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:37 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Cobol - S80A abend
>
> All:
>
> I have a question about error recovery and here is the situation.
>
> 1. Cobol STC calls an assembler module which passes
> a RACF c
All:
I have a question about error recovery and here is the situation.
1. Cobol STC calls an assembler module which passes
a RACF command using IRRSEQ00
2. The customer has a large profile, over 32K
3. We are seeing a S80A in 'IRRSEQ00'
Now the question, I know I can write a Cobol Condition
12 matches
Mail list logo
