Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-15 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 01:02 -0500 on 01/15/2016, Ed Finnell wrote about Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS: It's been years but I got involved in Notis(library) imports that were Ascii 8trks. The first cut was OTPCD=Q, but it was a 'strict ASCII' that didn't convert diacriticals. Think

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-15 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 00:20 -0600 on 01/15/2016, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS: On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:28:41 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: > ... did not support 8-Track tapes. ... Weren't those mostly used in automobiles? I remember when a collea

OPTCD=Q (was Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS)

2016-01-14 Thread Terry Sambrooks
Hi In a recent post it was stated "Bottom line, I think it's pretty clearly documented that BSAM/QSAM supports character set conversion, but only when tape is involved. I agree that that's a pretty ridiculous restriction" and this was for both OPRCD=Q and CCSID. This may seem like a ridiculous

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-14 Thread Pew, Curtis G
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 10:56 PM, Paul Gilmartin > <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > But does mere mention of OPTCD=Q mean its use is restricted to tapes? > Might not it apply to other device types? (It's hard to prove a negative) > But if it's so restricted it's

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-14 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 09:26 -0600 on 01/13/2016, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS: Does OPTCD=Q work on all device types? I had got the impression it applied only to tapes. My impression may be wrong but I seem to remember that OPTCD=Q was used ONLY on 7

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-14 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:28:41 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: > >... did not support 8-Track tapes. ... > Weren't those mostly used in automobiles? I remember when a colleague first saw a 3480 cartridge he asked, "Is that an 8-track?" -- gil

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-14 Thread Timothy Sipples
Curtis Pew wrote: >Bottom line, I think it’s pretty clearly documented that BSAM/QSAM >supports character set conversion, but only when tape is involved. Or virtual tape. Timothy Sipples IT

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-14 Thread Ed Finnell
It's been years but I got involved in Notis(library) imports that were Ascii 8trks. The first cut was OTPCD=Q, but it was a 'strict ASCII' that didn't convert diacriticals. Think they ended up using SAS but it's been a very long time. In a message dated 1/14/2016 11:29:26 P.M. Central

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-14 Thread Ed Finnell
VHS or Beta Max. 9trks for 3420's. In a message dated 1/15/2016 12:20:59 A.M. Central Standard Time, 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes: Weren't those mostly used in automobiles? I remember when a colleague first saw a 3480 cartridge he asked, "Is that an 8-track?"

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-13 Thread David S.
version for you, such as: http://www.discinterchange.com > Date:Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:04:58 + > From:"Ambros, Thomas" <thomas_amb...@keybank.com> > Subject: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS > > My apologies if there is a Cobol listserv

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:30:19 -0500, David S. wrote: >Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >> Does OPTCD=Q work on all device types? >> I had got the impression it applied only to tapes. > >Yes, tape is implicit. OPTCD=Q only works with tape. >ASCII conversion topic in "z/OS DFSMS: Using Magnetic Tapes":

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-13 Thread David S.
Paul Gilmartin wrote: > Does OPTCD=Q work on all device types? > I had got the impression it applied only to tapes. Yes, tape is implicit. OPTCD=Q only works with tape. ASCII conversion topic in "z/OS DFSMS: Using Magnetic Tapes":

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:51:47 -0500, David S. wrote: >... >If the data is *all* in character format, then conversion from ASCII to >EBCDIC is easy using OPTCD=Q on the DCB. > Does OPTCD=Q work on all device types? I had got the impression it applied only to tapes. There's also lately a CCSID

Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-12 Thread Ambros, Thomas
My apologies if there is a Cobol listserv that I should have subscribed to and submitted the question there, if someone knows of it please let me know so I can redirect to the correct place. Pardon me, also, if I use terms incorrectly in phrasing my question because I couldn't be weaker in

Re: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS

2016-01-12 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
EDU> Sent: Tue, Jan 12, 2016 10:05 am Subject: Conversion from Unisys Cobol file definitions to zOS My apologies if there is a Cobol listserv that I should have subscribed to and submitted the question there, if someone knows of it please let me know so I can redirect to the correct place. Par