David Betten wrote:
>I just found out you have a PMR open so no need to send anything to the DFSORT
>Hotline. The same people will be investigating this through the PMR process.
Good. I would be really interested in the result of that PMR.
Neil E. Ervin wrote:
> One calls the COPY function u
http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
07/18/2014 06:26:32 PM:
> From: David Betten/Gaithersburg/IBM@IBMUS
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Date: 07/18/2014 06:27 PM
> Subject: Re: DFSORT Performance
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
com
DFSORT/MVSontheweb at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
07/18/2014 02:46:30 PM:
> From: "Neil E. Ervin"
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Date: 07/18/2014 02:56 PM
> Subject: DFSORT Performance
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
ds,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Neil E. Ervin
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DFSORT Performance
Two simple DFSORT jobs (one COPY and one SORT).
One calls the COPY functio
Two simple DFSORT jobs (one COPY and one SORT).
One calls the COPY function using an INCLUDE which eliminates all the records.
The second calls the SORT function with the same INCLUDE eliminating all the
records so the final SORT is never executed.
The OPTION COPY does the same number of EXCPS b
