Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
U > Subject: Re: Default space allocation > > Sure - but these are the settings: > > SPACE PRIMARY(10) > SECONDARY(10) > DIRECTORY(0) > MEASURE(TRK) > PRIM_ORG(ALX) > NORLSE > UNIT NAME(SYSALLDA) > >

Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform) > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:07 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Default space allocation > > I have, and it wasn't apparent in there that it would have the effect > we've seen. > >

Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
ent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:07 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Default space allocation > > I have, and it wasn't apparent in there that it would have the effect we've > seen. > > > Andy Styles > z/Series Systems Programmer > > > >

Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Default space allocation -- This email has reached the Bank via an external source -- TSO ISPF I.4 DATACLAS column 8, 9, 10, 11(and 12 for PDS). On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform) <00d68f765d25-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote

Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Default space allocation -- This email has reached the Bank via an external source -- Have you checked out the ALLOCxx member of SYS1.PARMLIB (Or your version)? Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IB

Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Default space allocation > > Hi All, > > We've had a minor issue a few times over the past year or so. On our GDPS > control systems, we have a null SMS configuration - all datasets are allocated > with UNIT=SYSALLDA (I think I'm explaining this

Re: Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Mike Schwab
- one yesterday was 45K tracks, 1% used, which > used up nearly all the free space on the volume, and caused another job to > fail as it was unable to get the space it needed. > > I vaguely remember reading somewhere about default space allocation being > something along the lines of

Default space allocation

2016-07-19 Thread Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
is that people using XMIT/RECEIVE seem to allocate enormous datasets - one yesterday was 45K tracks, 1% used, which used up nearly all the free space on the volume, and caused another job to fail as it was unable to get the space it needed. I vaguely remember reading somewhere about default space