Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 7:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar On 5/13/2016 4:07 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

On 5/13/2016 4:07 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote: ... would it be okay to specify a reserve value to all partition profiles that equals the highest number of CPs that my CBU records allow? This would allow for total flexibility of CP assignment to any or all lpars. In my case, it would also

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

partitions on an opposing CPC for data center failover capability. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Greg Dyck Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

On 5/12/2016 10:17 AM, Mark Zelden wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2016 07:30:03 -0400, Richards, Robert B. wrote: I do have a follow-up question Is anyone aware of a downside to over specifying reserved CPs? LCCA/PCCA storage. But the default CBLOC has been VIRTUAL31

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

On 5/12/2016 10:17 AM, Mark Zelden wrote: LCCA/PCCA storage. But the default CBLOC has been VIRTUAL31 since z/OS 1.12. Even if you are still overriding it to below the line it shouldn't be a problem unless you are reserving a large number (FSVO large) and have 24-bit issues already in your

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

On Thu, 12 May 2016 07:30:03 -0400, Richards, Robert B. wrote: >I do have a follow-up question Is anyone aware of a downside to over >specifying reserved CPs? LCCA/PCCA storage. But the default CBLOC has been VIRTUAL31 since z/OS 1.12. Even if you are still

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

en, Cliff" <cliff.war...@mckesson.com> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 12/05/2016 16:41 Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Although this is not an HMC task I find I can ei

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

: (External):Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar You can add CPs or memory to an active LPAR, but you can't take either away without stopping the LPAR. You don't want more CPs assigned than you (or PR/SM) can use...it's just overhead. In fact, unused CPs will be "parked" on newer

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jon Butler Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar You can add CPs or memory to an active LPAR, but you can't take either away without st

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

You can add CPs or memory to an active LPAR, but you can't take either away without stopping the LPAR. You don't want more CPs assigned than you (or PR/SM) can use...it's just overhead. In fact, unused CPs will be "parked" on newer CECs when underutilized.

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

inPacker Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): https://developer.ibm.com/tv/category/mpt/ From: "Richards, Robert B." <robert.richa...@opm.gov> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 12/05/2016 12:21 Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar Sent by:

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

rds, Robert B." <robert.richa...@opm.gov> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 12/05/2016 12:30 Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> I can assure all that it works to ADD with reserved = 0

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

Behalf Of Christian Borntraeger Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar On 05/12/2016 08:33 AM, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote: > I am quite sure, at least for the z196, that you can online config CPs > online, if they hav

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar On Tue, 10 May 2016 16:56:32 -0400, Richards, Robert B. <robert.richa...@opm.gov> wrote: >I am in the middle of a

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

On 05/12/2016 08:33 AM, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote: > I am quite sure, at least for the z196, that you can online config CPs > online, if they have been defined as Reserved. To do so, you must change the > LPAR profile and de/reactivate the LPAR. So dynamically, in a running z/OS: > no.

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: 11 May, 2016 19:09 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar On Tue, 10 May 2016 16:56:32 -0400, Richards, Robert B. <robert.richa...@opm.gov> wrote: >I am in the middle of a

Re: Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

On Tue, 10 May 2016 16:56:32 -0400, Richards, Robert B. wrote: >I am in the middle of a CBU test and was wondering if it is possible on z/OS >yet to dynamically add (config or otherwise) a CP or two to an lpar *without* >that partition already having any specified as

Dynamic CPU ADD to a z/OS lpar

I am in the middle of a CBU test and was wondering if it is possible on z/OS yet to dynamically add (config or otherwise) a CP or two to an lpar *without* that partition already having any specified as reserved in their activation profile. A friend said yes, but I was unable locate how using