Mark Yuhas wrote:
Using the JCL provide by Mr. Engelbrecht, I discovered that the extract worked
as coded.
I'm glad for your part.
Thank you for this JCL which I will use again and again.
You are most welcome!
But I cannot take credits alone. Actually all credits and thanks must go to
Using the JCL provide by Mr. Engelbrecht, I discovered that the extract worked
as coded. What I also learned was that one of test LPARs was down for an
extended period of time. When the LPAR was IPLd, the latent SMF data was
copied to the input of the extract. Thus, the Type 80 for the
I am attempting to extract a subset of a subset of SMF data for a time period
from 00:00 to 14:00 on 8/9/2014 (2014221):
//SMFDPTAP EXEC PGM=IFASMFDP
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DUMPINDD DSN=SE.EN.X02.SCRT.DATA.G2871V00,DISP=SHR
//DUMPOUT DD DSN=TECH.SCRT.PART2,
//
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Yuhas
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 4:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Extracting SMF records with IFASMFDP
I am attempting to extract a subset of a subset of SMF data for a time period
from 00:00 to 14:00 on 8/9/2014 (2014221):
//SMFDPTAP EXEC PGM
:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Extracting SMF records with IFASMFDP
Try running the extract again, using TECH.SCRT.PART2 as your input and see what
dates you get. I think it MIGHT be giving you the beginning and ending dates
of the data it found in the input report.
Rex
Campbell Jay wrote:
Correct. The report shows the START and END timestamps of the input data - not
the output requested.
Yes, and since the OP is extracting record type 89, you can do a quick check on
the output whether the date/time selection works as advertised.
Something like this:
