Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-19 Thread Hank Oerlemans
OK. Fault Analyzer variant FA-I-318. Don't know whether the Debug one can be cloned so just needed one for my product. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu wit

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-17 Thread Seymour J Metz
du> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 11:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions? IBM ID’s are free and are not limited to people who have legitimate access to an IBM customer number. I have an IBM ID registered to my work email address and have ne

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-17 Thread Farley, Peter
Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 11:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions? That requires a userid. Ideally I'd not only like the report to show the as-modified instruction but also to use th

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-17 Thread Seymour J Metz
קֵּ֖ר From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 1:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions? Care to create an IBM IDEA at https://ideas.ibm.com/ for tra

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-16 Thread Hank Oerlemans
Care to create an IBM IDEA at https://ideas.ibm.com/ for tracking ? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-15 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Peter Relson Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 10:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions? Mike Schwab wrote Length is a nibble, x0 is one byte, one digit

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-15 Thread Peter Relson
Mike Schwab wrote Length is a nibble, x0 is one byte, one digit, one sign, xF is 16 bytes, 31 digits, 1 sign. On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:48 PM Seymour J Metz mailto:sme...@gmu.edu>> wrote: > > I have a program that is getting an S0C7 on an EX instruction. The output > from Fault Analyzer contain

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-15 Thread Seymour J Metz
ְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Mike Schwab <05962a42dc49-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 9:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Fault Analyzer outpu

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-15 Thread Seymour J Metz
Oerlemans Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 8:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions? Have you defined IDIADATA to FA during analysis ? Label "Data Field Declarations" appears for the execute event in the report which shows all of t

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-14 Thread Mike Schwab
Length is a nibble, x0 is one byte, one digit, one sign, xF is 16 bytes, 31 digits, 1 sign. On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:48 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > > I have a program that is getting an S0C7 on an EX instruction. The output > from Fault Analyzer contains the target instruction as is, with a zero

Re: Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-14 Thread Hank Oerlemans
Have you defined IDIADATA to FA during analysis ? Label "Data Field Declarations" appears for the execute event in the report which shows all of the defined field. Well in my basic test case anyway. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s

Fault Analyzer output for executed instructions?

2024-05-14 Thread Seymour J Metz
I have a program that is getting an S0C7 on an EX instruction. The output from Fault Analyzer contains the target instruction as is, with a zero length field, and only displays one byte of the operand. Is this a bug or a feature? Is there a way to force FA to display the entire field as defined