arc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GNU COBOL
Forgive me.
I really don't mean to be whining about this.
Up to now, the only USS that I've had access to has been that of an
employer, so to use such for building things that I
z/OS Open Tools" GitHub project have provided.
That will take time, but should eventually fall to automation. They've
got almost 200 packages, including RSYNC (THANK YOU!!), but I have not
found Gnu COBOL. Maybe Gnu COBOL "just works".
-- R; <><
On 3/19/24 08:38, Rick Tro
I'd be happy to run Gnu COBOL through it's paces on USS (as well as any
other FLOSS packages in the Chicory collection).
I just need a USS environment from which artifacts can be shared
publicly. (That is, not an employer's USS nor some other similarly
restricted USS.)
Got shell access where
Hi,A port to USS OMVS sounds perfect... :)
Dan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Monday, March 18, 2024, 5:57 PM, Rick Troth
<058ff5c2d0a7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
I try to maintain working copies of Gnu COBOL in the Chicory collection.
Presently we have Gnu COB
I try to maintain working copies of Gnu COBOL in the Chicory collection.
Presently we have Gnu COBOL 3.2 for FreeBSD (64 bit), AMD/Intel Linux
(64-bit and 32-bit), and Z or S390 Linux (64-bit and 31-bit).
rsync://chic.casita.net/opt/gnucobol-3.2/
-- R; <><
On 3/16/24 15:36, Ma
GnuCOBOL "has reached an industrial maturity and can compete with proprietary
offers in all environments," boasted contributor Fabrice Le Fessant, in a
FOSDEM talk.
https://thenewstack.io/20-years-in-the-making-gnucobol-is-ready-for-industry/
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com),
