On 2016-10-27 15:01, Jim Mulder wrote:
For master trace, I prefer something like 500K or 999K.
Even the maximum of 999K is a pretty small amount of storage at today's
prices, and a larger MTRACE provides the convenience of sometimes not
needing to figure out where the syslog is archived. And
> The minimum and default (since z/OS 1.10) of 1M per CPU for
system trace is often adequate, and that is what is used in many
of the dumps I see.
As said, we currently have 15MB per processor, which seems to be luxurious I
conclulde from the responses I got.
>The larger the trace, the more
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
> I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to
> z13. We currently have set them to 15M (per processor). What do others use?
Like Barbara, we are also at 999K (Actually documentation says, it will be
translated to 1M).
John Eells wrote:
>We
>I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to z13.
>We currently have set them to 15M (per processor).
>What do others use?
We're still at 1M per processor (even on z13), but then there isn't much system
trace reading done here. If your central storage layout can
> >>> I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we
> moved to z13. We currently have set them to 15M (per processor).
> >>> What do others use?
> >
> >> No-one interested in reading system trace? Or is this company
secrect?
> >
> > I'm surprised you got no reactions.
> >
> >
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to z13.
We currently have set them to 15M (per processor).
What do others use?
No-one interested in reading system trace? Or is this company secrect?
I'm surprised you
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>> I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to
>> z13. We currently have set them to 15M (per processor).
>> What do others use?
>No-one interested in reading system trace? Or is this company secrect?
I'm surprised you got no reactions.
> I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to
> z13. We currently have set them to 15M (per processor).
> What do others use?
No-one interested in reading system trace? Or is this company secrect?
--
Peter Hunkeler
I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to z13.
We currently have set them to 15M (per processor).
What do others use?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
