In <9286832208987587.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
11/19/2015
at 11:55 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>Why is it preferable to fail directly rather than to (attempt to)
>fall back to an equivalent alternative service?
Why are you peddlin
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:18:36 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> on 11/18/2015 at 03:05 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>
>>Sophistry!
>
>PKB.
>
>>If the user is not authorized,
>
>There's more than one user.
>
??? How many users does a job have?
>>it's de facto unavailable and should be treated a
In <2680722424903653.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
11/18/2015
at 03:05 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>Sophistry!
PKB.
>If the user is not authorized,
There's more than one user.
>it's de facto unavailable and should be treated as suc
W dniu 2015-11-19 o 01:02, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On 2015-11-18 16:17, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2015-11-18 o 22:05, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
Sophistry! If the user is not authorized, it's de facto unavailable and
should be treated as such.
I dare to disagree.
The service is up and ready. It does not al
On 2015-11-18 16:17, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2015-11-18 o 22:05, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
>>>
>> Sophistry! If the user is not authorized, it's de facto unavailable and
>> should be treated as such.
> I dare to disagree.
> The service is up and ready. It does not allow anyone to use it, but even
> una
W dniu 2015-11-18 o 22:05, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:51:00 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
Still not sure why smp/e is trying to use ICSF when CSF is not
active. As per IBM to calculate SHA-1 hash values for GIMUNZIP
service routines if SMP/E detects ICSF is not available then
You may want to define CSF.CSFSERV.AUTH.CSFOWH.DISABLE CLASS(XFACILIT)
This disables SAF checks in ICSF for CSNBOWH (hash/mac) calls, and can
improve performance since these calls might be made frequently.
Of course, someone may have a reason why these calls should be SAF
protected, but that is n
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:51:00 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>> Still not sure why smp/e is trying to use ICSF when CSF is not
>> active. As per IBM to calculate SHA-1 hash values for GIMUNZIP
>> service routines if SMP/E detects ICSF is not available then SMP/e
>> will automatically use an smp/e j
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:44:45 +0530, Peter wrote:
>Thanks. Though the CHECKAUTH is marked as 'NO' and CSF is not active but
>still its failing to call CSNBOWH
I think it's likely that ICSF is active, or you wouldn't get that return/reason
code.
In any case, CHECKAUTH controls whether ICSF perfo
Still not sure why smp/e is trying to use ICSF when CSF is not
active. As per IBM to calculate SHA-1 hash values for GIMUNZIP
service routines if SMP/E detects ICSF is not available then SMP/e
will automatically use an smp/e java application to calculate SHA-1
hash values as an alternative.
Ah,
r if you need this service.
HTH
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 1:08 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: ICSF callable service error S
Hi,
Still not sure why smp/e is trying to use ICSF when CSF is not active. As
per IBM to calculate SHA-1 hash values for GIMUNZIP service routines if
SMP/E detects ICSF is not available then SMP/e will automatically use an
smp/e java application to calculate SHA-1 hash values as an alternative.
O
Thanks. Though the CHECKAUTH is marked as 'NO' and CSF is not active but
still its failing to call CSNBOWH
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Beesley, Paul wrote:
>
> >Return code 8
> 08 (08) An application error occurred. The c
Beesley, Paul wrote:
>Return code 8
08 (08) An application error occurred. The callable service was stopped
due to an error in the parameters. Or, another condition was encountered that
needs to be investigated.
>Reason code 3E80
3E80 (16000)RACF failed your request to use this
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ICSF callable service error SMP/e
Hello,
I am receiving the below error during GIMUNZIP
Hello,
I am receiving the below error during GIMUNZIP process during a product
install.
GIM43501S ** THE CALL TO THE CSNBOWH SERVICE FAILED WHEN PROCESSING
THE RETURN CODE WAS '0008'X AND THE REASON CODE WAS '3E80'X
I understand that SMP/e is failing while calling the ICSF services, But
16 matches
Mail list logo
