>
> What is ELF? What environments and languages for those environments
> (other than those already mentioned) support ELF Application Binary
> Interfaces? The results of my searches have left me confused.
>
> Clark Morris
Hi Clark,
Check out
Clark Morris wrote:
Would
a non-IBM C/C++ be suitable for TPF?
Clark Morris
z/TPF is an ELF-based environment. You can use a z/TPF-targeted variant
of GCC
or the Dignus tool chain for z/TPF.
I don't believe there are too many (any?) TPF 4.1 shops still around,
but at that
time
Clark Morris wrote:
>Does TPF support Ziip/Zaap processors? Does PL1 support TPF?
>Would metal C or a non-IBM C/C++ be suitable for TPF?
I see Dana Mitchell already replied about ALCS. In short, anything you can
do on/with z/OS you should be able to do on/with ALCS. That includes
whatever
We run ALCS here, all applications are written in assembler, but it does
support LE:
(ALCS) interfaces with the IBM Language Environment® for MVS file medium
supported by the MVS Data Facility Product to be written in the C, C++, PL/I,
and COBOL languages. ALCS also provides relational
ent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 10:09 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Fwd: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
>> Date: April 18, 2018 at 1:06:33 PM EDT
>> To: "reichma
I don't often agree with you, Scott, but when one of the leading mainframe
advisers advocates replacing mainframe assembler code with multi-platform java,
it's only a matter of time before businesses will try to save money on hardware
also.
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 20:50, scott Ford
Agreed, that would be interesting: same (significant and reasonable) Java
workload on Linux on Intel, Windows on Intel, z/OS, and zLinux. And throw Linux
on AWS in there as well.
I'm almost at a position where I could do most of those. I think I did some of
those tests a few years ago, but I
Cheryl Watson wrote:
>There are two very big reasons to replace assembler with
>Java The second is that Java, for the most part, will
>run on zIIPs and reduce the cost of software.
Although I'm fond of Java, I'm not bold enough to make that cost forecast,
not as a general prediction anyway.
On 19/04/2018 12:00 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
On 19/04/2018 5:19 AM, Cheryl Watson wrote:
The z13 and z14 can run Java faster than any other processor.
Do you mean any other mainframe processor? My observations are that Java
runs
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>On 19/04/2018 5:19 AM, Cheryl Watson wrote:
>> The z13 and z14 can run Java faster than any other processor.
>
>Do you mean any other mainframe processor? My observations are that Java
>runs significantly faster on a x86 Linux system
On 19/04/2018 5:19 AM, Cheryl Watson wrote:
The z13 and z14 can run Java faster than any other processor.
Do you mean any other mainframe processor? My observations are that Java
runs significantly faster on a x86 Linux system compared to our z13s
running z/OS with a zIIP.
It's not just Java
n
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 10:09 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Fwd: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
> > Date: April 18, 2018 at
nframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Fwd: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
> Date: April 1
istserv.ua.edu
Subject: Fwd: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
> Date: April 18, 2018 at 1:06:33 PM EDT
> To: "reichman...@gmail.com" <reichman...@gmail.com>
> Subject: FW: IRS Assemb
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike LaMartina
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 1:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
I am surprised that IRS wants to replace Assembler with Java.
I can't think of a bigger
Subject: Fwd: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
> Date: April 18, 2018 at 1:06:33 PM EDT
> To: "reichman...@gmail.com" <reichman...@gmail.com>
> Subject: FW: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jo
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Reichman Joseph <joseph.reich...@irs.gov>
> Date: April 18, 2018 at 1:06:33 PM EDT
> To: "reichman...@gmail.com" <reichman...@gmail.com>
> Subject: FW: IRS Assembler Java Big Plus Jobs
>
>
>
>
> From: Reichm
17 matches
Mail list logo
