: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Gould
Sent: Friday, 9 June 2017 1:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LE QuestionT - now CICS
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 7:49 AM, Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
Peter,
We write software using COBOL and HLASM and I had a situation where subpool
0 had orphaned blocks of storage and our STC was apparently in control.
I found out that a RMODE=24, AMODE=24 HLASM PGM doing disk I/O and called
by a STC has to do Freepool and after a close.
We were using RACF
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 7:49 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
> SNIP———
Peter, good answer.
This reminds me a little of something long long ago. Maybe someone here can
refresh (correct?) my memory.
From the time CICS came out the sysprogs were always
> My first question is where does LE place the HEAP ( what Subpool ) ?
And my initial response is a question: why would you care what subpool?
The subpool is almost certainly not a programming interface. You should
not write any code that depends on the subpool
Any presentation that describes
Re: AW: Re: LE QuestionT
On 7 June 2017 at 08:38, David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IIRC subpool 1 is for LE internals and subpool 2 for user heap and stack.
> Makes sense so presumably a user-space storage overwrite wont corrupt
> LE so it can shutdown cleanly.
Diffe
On 7 June 2017 at 08:38, David Crayford wrote:
> IIRC subpool 1 is for LE internals and subpool 2 for user heap and stack.
> Makes sense so presumably a user-space storage overwrite wont corrupt LE so
> it can shutdown cleanly.
Different subpools of user-key storage won't
in subpool 2.
this is true for heap and Stack
allocation.
I remember a very useful IBM presentation
on this topic which is titled "stacks are simple,
heaps are Fun". you will find it using Google
hth
Kind regards
Bernd
--- Original-Nachricht ---
Von: Charles Mills
Betreff: Re: LE Quest
- Original-Nachricht ---
Von: Charles Mills
Betreff: Re: LE QuestionT
Datum: 06.06.2017, 17:06 Uhr
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
In-line.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of scott Ford
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 20
In-line.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of scott Ford
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 7:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: LE QuestionT
> I need some help understanding LE and Cobol. I ran our Cobol
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: LE QuestionT
>
> All:
>
> I need some help understanding LE and Cobol. I ran our Cobol STC with RPT
> options and STG options on, i see a large like 700K Heap size. My first
> question is where does LE place the HEAP ( what Subpool
All:
I need some help understanding LE and Cobol. I ran our Cobol STC with RPT
options and STG options on, i see a large like 700K Heap size. My first
question is where does LE place the HEAP ( what Subpool ) ? Secondly, is
that HEAP storage freed anytime during the running of a STC written in
11 matches
Mail list logo