Re: MQ Buffer expansion

2016-07-20 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Neubert, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: MQ Buffer expansion Of course it depends, but 2 for buffer pool 0 could be low as well. Any chance you can actually analyze the

Re: MQ Buffer expansion

2016-07-20 Thread Lucas, Garrett
AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: FW: MQ Buffer expansion Hi, I tried the MQ group (as I know it), but I haven't heard back. Does someone know what effect upping MQ pools will have? Many Thanks in advance, Dave From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN Sent: Monday, July 18, 201

Re: MQ Buffer expansion

2016-07-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin
20, 2016 9:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: FW: MQ Buffer expansion Hi, I tried the MQ group (as I know it), but I haven't heard back. Does someone know what effect upping MQ pools will have? Many Thanks in advance, Dave From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN Sent: M

FW: MQ Buffer expansion

2016-07-20 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Hi, I tried the MQ group (as I know it), but I haven't heard back. Does someone know what effect upping MQ pools will have? Many Thanks in advance, Dave From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 3:26 PM To: 'mqser...@listserv.meduniwien.ac.at' Sub