Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-10 Thread mf db
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of mf db Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I Hello Lizette, I did for SETSMS for COMMDS there was no response at all, but for SCDS and ACDS i got

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-10 Thread Jake anderson
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of mf db Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I Hello Lizette, I did for SETSMS for COMMDS there was no response at all, but for SCDS and ACDS i got the below

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-10 Thread Jake anderson
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of mf db Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I Hello Lizette, I did for SETSMS for COMMDS there was no response at all, but for SCDS and ACDS i got the below

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In CAPikFhEBJ_Lx3L_inEwNaYpyy2i22bduLQ-H=ru2y6cg8to...@mail.gmail.com, on 10/10/2013 at 11:36 PM, mf db dbajava...@gmail.com said: IGD056I COMMDS SYSTEM.ZT01.COMMDS NOT FOUND What is the definition of SYSTEM in the master catalof for the new LPAR? What is the definition of SYSTEM.ZT01.COMMDS?

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-10 Thread Lizette Koehler
Of mf db Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I Hello, I have created a LDS, Its the main catalog volume where I have created this COMMDS,ACDS,SCDS. I was able to bring up the system but when I try to use ISMF 8.3

NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
Hello Group, I am trying to bring up our sandbox for testing purpose, but while Bring up the I get message as IGD002I : NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET Though i have defined it in IGDSMS00 and Also I did the activate of SET SMS=xx, but still I do not get this activated during IPL. This is a new

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Lizette Koehler
Of mf db Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 12:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I Hello Group, I am trying to bring up our sandbox for testing purpose, but while Bring up the I get message as IGD002I : NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET Though i have defined

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Lizette Koehler
: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I What were you doing at the time? And IPL? A SETSMS? How is your IGDSMSxx member created? SMSACDS(dsname) COMMDS(dsname) Try a SETSMS COMMDS(x) Check my syntax. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 12:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I What were you doing at the time? And IPL? A SETSMS? How is your IGDSMSxx member created? SMSACDS

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Jim Blalock
: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I What were you doing at the time? And IPL? A SETSMS? How is your IGDSMSxx member created? SMSACDS(dsname) COMMDS(dsname) Try a SETSMS COMMDS(x) Check my syntax. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
, 2013 12:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I What were you doing at the time? And IPL? A SETSMS? How is your IGDSMSxx member created? SMSACDS(dsname) COMMDS(dsname) Try a SETSMS COMMDS(x) Check my syntax

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Mark Zelden
Is the system or sysplex defined to the configuration? Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com ITIL v3 Foundation Certified Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
Its not in the sysplex.. its a monoplex On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote: Is the system or sysplex defined to the configuration? Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com ITIL v3 Foundation Certified

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Mark Zelden
So is the system name defined to the configuration? BTW, a monoplex still has a sysplex name unless it is running sysplex(local). -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com ITIL v3 Foundation Certified

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
We have made the PLEXCFG=XCFLOCAL in the ieasys00 and the system is defined in the configuration. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote: So is the system name defined to the configuration? BTW, a monoplex still has a sysplex name unless it is running

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread baby eklavya
I guess , Mark is asking whether the SYSNAME is defined in SCDS . On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:36 AM, mf db dbajava...@gmail.com wrote: We have made the PLEXCFG=XCFLOCAL in the ieasys00 and the system is defined in the configuration. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Mark Zelden

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
Where do you specify the SYSNAME in SCDS ? Is it in IDCAM control card ? SYSNAME is too even defined in IEASYS00. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:40 AM, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.comwrote: I guess , Mark is asking whether the SYSNAME is defined in SCDS . On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:36 AM,

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread baby eklavya
It can be donw using option 8.3 in ISMF . And then an SMS configuration should be activated from that SCDS. The new name will then be placed in the ACDS. SMS will then propagate that information to the COMMDS . Mark , please correct me if am wrong ! On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:42 AM, mf db

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Clifford McNeill
I did for SETSMS for COMMDS there was no response at all, but for SCDS and ACDS i got the below : setsms acds(system.zt01.acds) IGD068I ACDS SYSTEM.ZT01.ACDS SPECIFIED IS THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE ACDS - COMMAND IS REJECTED setsms scds(system.zt01.scds) IGD056I ACDS SYSTEM.ZT01.ACDS NOT

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread mf db
The SCDS is catalogued on the system where I am trying to IPL it. So I am not sure if ISMF is going to help me to change the sysname using ISMF from the different system.. Is there a way to change in batch process ?(Since the system is still not Up) On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:42 AM, mf db

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Mark Zelden
So the system does not come up far enough without SMS for you to logon to TSO/ISPF and get into ISMF? If you are doing this from a driving system, the way that sort of issue is dealt with is via SSA. For VSAM, you do that via define path. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services -

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Lizette Koehler
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of mf db Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I Hello Lizette, I did for SETSMS for COMMDS there was no response

Re: NO COMMUNICATIONS DATA SET - IGD002I

2013-10-09 Thread Robert Hahne
I guess , Mark is asking whether the SYSNAME is defined in SCDS . I believe ,there should be a SYSNAME already defined . If not , you would have seen a message as given below IGD081I COMMDS dsname DOES NOT HAVE SYSTEM sysname OR SYSPLEX sysplex DEFINED