Anyone else out there getting numerous notifications, around 300 now, from Broadcom regarding the release of CAIRIM 2.2? I've contacted them but I really don't think the person on the other end understands that something happened yesterday around 11am and hasn't stopped. Got bug somewhere they do.
On 5/24/19 10:14 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote: > Kurt, > > Speaking of RSUs, is there a way to provide an inventory of PTFs already > received so that I don't end up reordering and transmitting gigabytes of PTFs > that have already been ordered, downloaded and received? As it is now, I am > forced to run the RSU job on the weekend so that I stop getting the "17 of > 20" failures after hours of wall clock time. > > And while I am thinking of enhancements, how about an optional check of a > mask against a mask of the DDDEF volser that would flag a difference? Yeah, I > know, the file allocation report is supposed to be the last line of defense, > but sometimes it is tough to spot a one character difference. Ask me how I > know. Still not sure why a coworker changed it without letting others know. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 9:38 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: RSUs > > On 5/23/2019 10:18 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote: > >> We did a RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) in early April (just after the >> "New Service Levels" email), and got a number of fixes for RSU1903. Over the >> last couple of days, it's been discovered that we are missing a few PTFs >> that would be part of RSU1903 - or earlier. >> >> Yesterday, I therefore as an exercise did another RECEIVE ORDER >> CONTENT(RECOMMENDED), and this time got more fixes for RSU1903. >> >> Do IBM assign RSU numbers retrospectively to PTFs, after the published RSU >> date? > No, IBM does NOT assign RSU sourceids to PTFs retroactively after the > published RSU date. At least its not supposed to work that way. Are > you sure on your second RECEIVE ORDER one or more ASSIGN statements for > RSU1903 were received? Or did you specify the RSU1903 SOURCEID on the > RECEIVE command your self? If you did receive such ASSIGN statements, > and if you still have it, I'd like to see the RECEIVE command output for > both jobs please. > > BTW, as already mentioned, consider using CONTENT(ALL) instead of > CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) in the future. I'm hard pressed to think of a good > reason to only obtain recommended PTFs these days. > > Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development > Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Brian W. France Systems Administrator (Mainframe) Pennsylvania State University Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/SYSARC Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802 814-863-4739 b...@psu.edu "To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
