In such a historical overview, you have to make a selection.
Of course, there are other machines also to be considered mainframes,
for example General Electric machines or machines in foreign countries,
Europe
or the Soviet Union. Some of them were very powerful and sophisticated
and built in
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/610.html
From: Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 05/06/2013 10:35 AM
Subject:Re: OE Historical article re: Mainframes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_computer_hardware_in_Soviet_Bloc_countries
From: Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 05/06/2013 10:35 AM
Subject:Re: OE Historical article re: Mainframes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion
Ron Wells wrote:
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/610.html
Thanks. Very Interesting Article! ;-D
I have ADDed this nice acronym in that article to my list of acronyms: CADET -
Can't Add, Doesn't Even Try grin
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
http://www.homecomputer.de/pages/easteurope_ro.html
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
interesting to see what other were up too...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for
West Germany:
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telefunken:
The mainframe computer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainframe_computer
TR 4 was developed at Telefunken in Backnang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backnang, and the TR 440 model was
developed at Telefunken in Konstanz
In 016701ce491b$66732590$335970b0$@mxg.com, on 05/04/2013
at 06:02 PM, Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com said:
But they skipped the 610,
A bit underpowered to be considered a mainframe. Wasn't it
contemporaneous with the much faster 704?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
On Fri, 3 May 2013 21:13:56 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote:
On 2013-05-03 18:24:07 Phil Smith wrote:
http://www.tomshardware.com/picturestory/508-mainframe-computer-history.html
I didn't realize that Eniac was that big... 49-ft high cabinets! Wow!
And:
Also, in a backward step
Yeah , my dad worked at Univac later Unisys and talked about them, in the days
of tubes ..etc
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On May 3, 2013, at 10:13 PM, J. Leslie Turriff jlturr...@centurytel.net
wrote:
On 2013-05-03 18:24:07 Phil
On 05/04/2013 11:36 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 21:13:56 -0500, J. Leslie Turriff wrote:
On 2013-05-03 18:24:07 Phil Smith wrote:
http://www.tomshardware.com/picturestory/508-mainframe-computer-history.html
I didn't realize that Eniac was that big... 49-ft high
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 1:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OE Historical article re: Mainframes
On 05/04/2013 11:36 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 21:13:56
12 matches
Mail list logo
