Re: PDSE DELETE PENDING

2019-08-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:34:34 -0500, Steve Horein wrote: > >Much better. >While I can't help with the question of "what really happens...", it does >seem that -something- must happen to the PDSE to allow successful deletion >of those members. In the case of this particular NetView data set, "REACC"

Re: PDSE DELETE PENDING

2019-08-29 Thread Steve Horein
I was unaware of the PERFORMPENDINGDELETE option. Nice. Anecdotal: I'm a automation administrator, and have struggled with NetView's DSILIST data set that is used to retain various automation table listings/reports. IBM recommends allocating this data set as a PDSE to avoid Sx37 ABENDs and/or the

Re: PDSE DELETE PENDING

2019-08-29 Thread Tabari Alexander
One of the differences between PDSes and PDSEs is that PDSEs reclaim the space of deleted members. In order for that to be done, however, the PDSE address space needs to know that the member is no longer in use so it is safe for the space to be reclaimed. If the space cannot be reclaimed at the

PDSE DELETE PENDING

2019-08-28 Thread Kenneth J. Kripke
The url https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/pdse-member-pending-delete-processing-over view indicates that when executing IEBPDSE with the PARM='PERFORMPENDINGDELETE,NOANALYSIS' Seems to imply that space will be released for deleted members. We do routine maintenance on various Linklist datasets