I apologize that I forgot about my initial post.
First, I realize that my memory failed me when I issued D
PROG,LNKLST,NAME=lnklstset,USERS. I hope the syntax is now burned in.
Second, I tried Peter's suggestion:
-setprog apf,add,dsn=a.b,sms apf,delete,dsn=a.b,sms
CSV410I
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bruce Schaefer
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Peculiar behavior of D PROG,LNKLST.
I apologize that I forgot about my initial post.
First, I realize that my memory failed me when I issued D
PROG,LNKLST
In 2872469204284460.wa.bruce.schagmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
10/17/2012
at 10:38 AM, Bruce Schaefer bruce.s...@gmail.com said:
Am I wrong to expect the same response from these commands:
Yes. The general rule in MVS is that positional operands precede
keyword operands.
On my z/OS 1.12
W dniu 2012-10-18 13:42, Peter Relson pisze:
The general rule of system commands is:
If you enter something that is documented as valid, it will work or we
will fix the code or the documentation.
If you enter something that is not documented as valid, no assumption
about what you will get is
Hello list,
Am I wrong to expect the same response from these commands:
D PROG,LNKLST,USERS,NAME=CURRENT
D PROG,LNKLST,NAME=CURRENT,USERS
On my z/OS 1.12 systems, anything after NAME=CURRENT is ignored, including
invalid options.
Thanks
Bruce, interesting. I see the same on my 1.13 system. The doc is a little
unclear, but it looks like for what you want to do, you'd issue D
PROG,LNKLST,USERS,CURRENT. Which is basically your first command. Your second
command is essentially the first option in the definition in system commands:
When I was using D PROG,LNKLST,NAME=prior-set,USERS and it didn't give me an
error or the list of users, I wish it knew what I meant :)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
