gt; >Date:Mon, 14 May 2018 00:12:54 +
> >From:Jesse 1 Robinson
> >mailto:jesse1.robin...@sce.com>>
> >Subject: Re: Problem with $BUFFER control block
>
> >I was hopeful that the IEZIOB would include the missing fields.
> >Unfortunately it does no
On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:12:54 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>I was hopeful that the IEZIOB would include the missing fields. Unfortunately
>it does not. Before opening an SR with IBM, I thought I'd give the List one
>more shot. The $BUFFER macro changed in z/OS 2.2; we're jumping from 2.1 to
le
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Problem with $BUFFER control block
The $BUFFER macro contains this line:
* $Z22LCKP=64BCKPT HJE77A0 140821 TJW: Use MVS IOB DSECT*
So I would guess that, starting with z.OS 2.2, you need to include
the SYS1.MACLIB(IEZIOB)DSECT in your program.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp
I'm embarrassed to ask this question, but I've been over the same ground many
times to no avail. We have carried several SMF exits from release to release
without complications. In moving from z/OS 2.1 to 2.3, we suddenly get an
assembly error in $BUFFER that makes no sense:
