Massimo Biancucci ha scritto:
>AFAIK if you're using standard application on zOS (Cobol, PLI etc.) you
>need a MQ Server AS up and running on the client lpars.
>MQ Server means license and costs.
For z/OS specifically, there is no separate MQ "server" or "client"
license.(*) It's IBM MQ for z/OS
On 3/3/20 5:57 PM, Longnecker, Dennis wrote:
If one had MQ on the Z and it was doing all the QMgrs/Queue work, do the
clients (that aren't QMgrs/Queue) on the other boxes need cost/purchase
licenses?
I am not IBM. I am not a lawyer. The clients are free to distribute if
you have an
Dennis Longdecker wrote:
>Wondering if anyone here is using MQ Series on the z/os box
>and knows about the licensing?
>If one had MQ on the Z and it was doing all the QMgrs/Queue
>work, do the clients (that aren't QMgrs/Queue) on the other
>boxes need cost/purchase licenses? What I am finding
Dennis,
AFAIK if you're using standard application on zOS (Cobol, PLI etc.) you
need a MQ Server AS up and running on the client lpars.
MQ Server means license and costs.
The amount of the cost depends on your licensing type. This case zNALC
could be a good option.
Of course you've to ask your
Wondering if anyone here is using MQ Series on the z/os box and knows about the
licensing?
If one had MQ on the Z and it was doing all the QMgrs/Queue work, do the
clients (that aren't QMgrs/Queue) on the other boxes need cost/purchase
licenses? What I am finding is:
- The MQ clients are
