In
<874b151289704e46a874bf2ae6fdd8d1310d6...@kl126r4b.cs.ad.klmcorp.net>,
on 12/23/2015
at 03:18 PM, "Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM"
said:
>I was not asking for all the possibilities on all possible platforms,
>I was trying to ensure that it was readable and
In , on 12/22/2015
at 11:59 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" said:
>Via Email just go UTF-8. The same for Web Pages or just use the
>Unicode codepoint () or .
Using for µ is appropriate for web pages, but not for text in
e-mail. HTML in
In <5679d5c0.3090...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 12/22/2015
at 11:59 PM, "R.S." said:
>It is kind for recipients to use "lowest common denominator"
The least common denominator is ASCII, but as long as you have the
right MIME header fields pretty much everybody
In , on 12/22/2015
at 11:54 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" said:
>On a Mac it is Option-m.
On a PC there are multiple keyboard layouts. On OS/2 with the US
International layout, Right-Alt-M gets µ. Depending on the layout R.S.
is using, it
(Seymour J.)
Sent: 23 December, 2015 16:16
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing
In <p06240405d29fd8ea06d7@[192.168.1.242]>, on 12/22/2015
at 11:54 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9...@panix.com> said:
>On a Mac
W dniu 2015-12-22 o 21:13, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On 2015-12-22 11:15, R.S. wrote:
It would be better to define usec at the first occurence.
Or use full name: 'microsecond'.
BTW: 'us' seems to be more cryptic, while it's more correct than usec.
what about "μs"
That's the best, the most
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:39 PM, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2015-12-22 o 21:13, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
>>
>> On 2015-12-22 11:15, R.S. wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be better to define usec at the first occurence.
>>> Or use full name: 'microsecond'.
>>> BTW: 'us' seems to be
W dniu 2015-12-22 o 21:58, Mike Schwab pisze:
UTF-8 includes them all. But UTF-EBCDIC is only suggested
transformations, not storage.
Compatibility.
It is kind for recipients to use "lowest common denominator" instead of
"my standard is the best one". I have no problems with viewing mu letter
On 2015-12-22 11:15, R.S. wrote:
> It would be better to define usec at the first occurence.
> Or use full name: 'microsecond'.
> BTW: 'us' seems to be more cryptic, while it's more correct than usec.
>
what about "μs"
-- gil
At 23:59 +0100 on 12/22/2015, R.S. wrote about Re: [Bulk] Re:
Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing:
I have no problems with viewing mu letter (it's much harder to type
it), but I can imagine others still may have ones.
HARD TO TYPE? On a Mac it is Option-m. On a Windows machine
At 03:58 -0600 on 12/22/2015, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote about Re:
[Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing:
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
Yes, u as a replacement of the greek letter mu, used to indicate
the micro prefix, where the greek letter cannot be used.
Many thanks. Much
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>Yes, u as a replacement of the greek letter mu, used to indicate the micro
>prefix, where the greek letter cannot be used.
Many thanks. Much appreciated. I agree it can be somewhat troublesome to send
Greek and Russian (or Japanese) characters via e-mail
versions.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: 22 December, 2015 10:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>One crucial parameter: at what distance are the CFs?
Distance is indeed important.
>... 5 usecs ... 150 usecs ...
First time I see 'usecs' here [1] on IBM-MAIM. After looking in Wikipedia, I
want to know - is this microseconds? ( SI unit of time equal to
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin Packer
Sent: 22 December, 2015 8:55
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing
We're not going to BLANKET recommend System-Managed Duplexing for
high-volume, high stringency structures such as LOCK1. SCA has little
traffic
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>One crucial parameter: at what distance are the CFs?
Distance is indeed important.
>... 5 usecs ... 150 usecs ...
First time I see 'usecs' here [1] on IBM-MAIM.
In
<2623328940257590.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu>,
on 12/22/2015
at 03:15 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
said:
>First time I see 'usecs' here [1] on IBM-MAIM.
I've never seen usec or Ásec[1] on IBM-MAIM. I have, however, seen
them on IBM-MAIN.
I'm talking from experience. The two hours-long CEC failures we had--most
recently in the fall of 2014--took down all CICS and DB2 applications as well
as three ICFs on the box that failed. The secondary 'penalty' box stayed up and
kept live copies of structures so that after hardware repair,
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing
I'm talking from experience. The two hours-long CEC failures we had--most
recently in the fall of 2014--took down all CICS and DB2 applications as well
as three ICFs on the box that failed. The secondary 'penalty' box
cker
From: "Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM" <kees.verno...@klm.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 22/12/2015 07:39
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Of cour
20 matches
Mail list logo