Adjacent 01 levels have been used to allocate storage larger than the maximum
allowed by COBOL.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:18:53 -0300 Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
wrote:
:On 20 Sep 2013 08:12:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main John Gilmore
:wrote:
:
:The idea of eliminating unreferenced
Subject: Re: Unused variables
Binyamin Dissen makes a very important point with
begin extract
Adjacent 01 levels have been used to allocate storage larger than the
maximum allowed by COBOL.
end extract/
I have recently been accused of being a pedant. Let me therefore act
the part
On 9/23/2013 10:55 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
On 23 Sep 2013 06:09:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Adjacent 01 levels have been used to allocate storage larger than the maximum
allowed by COBOL.
With the more recent versions of COBOL is the practice still necessary
or can the
On 23 Sep 2013 06:09:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Adjacent 01 levels have been used to allocate storage larger than the maximum
allowed by COBOL.
With the more recent versions of COBOL is the practice still necessary
or can the tables be large enough? Given the existence of
Scott, Can you please send me that PPT?
Thanks,
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 20 Sep 2013 08:12:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main John Gilmore
wrote:
The idea of eliminating unreferenced variables in COBOL record
declarations is of course absurd, and fulminations against it are at
best otiose. It is always possible to construct quietist arguments
against change, any
Yeah, might have to go back and read some of those old backups for legal or
otherwise unplanned situations. Probably be on the bottom of a 'to do' list as
we covert to JAVA.
In a message dated 09/21/13 18:18:57 Central Daylight Time,
cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca writes:
This may also apply to
Check out the compiler option XREF
snip
Hello. We have cobol programs where we are seeing lots of unused variables. Is
there a way we get all the unused variables from the program?
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Ron Thomas wrote:
Hello. We have cobol programs where we are seeing lots of unused variables. Is
there a way we get all the unused variables from the program?
Beside eating up valuable storage during execution, is this a problem?
You need to use Two Tools: XREF(FULL) and your eyes.
But, be
On 9/20/2013 7:05 AM, Staller, Allan wrote:
Check out the compiler option XREF
snip
Hello. We have cobol programs where we are seeing lots of unused variables. Is
there a way we get all the unused variables from the program?
/snip
If you are using current COBOL, the compile option
On 09/20/2013 08:13 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Ron Thomas wrote:
Hello. We have cobol programs where we are seeing lots of unused variables.
Is there a way we get all the unused variables from the program?
Beside eating up valuable storage during execution, is this a problem?
You
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:00:08 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
It is a common and good practice to use Copy Books to define identical
record layouts for record structures that are accessed by multiple
programs, even if some of the programs only need to access a single
field in the record or just
Hi,
I agree.. anybody that thinks they need to remove unused variables in a
Cobol program should rather RETIRE or vote for TED CRUZ.
Kerneels
On 9/20/2013 9:12 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
The idea of eliminating unreferenced variables in COBOL record
declarations is of course absurd, and
The idea of eliminating unreferenced variables in COBOL record
declarations is of course absurd, and fulminations against it are at
best otiose. It is always possible to construct quietist arguments
against change, any and all change; but this straw man is too
obviously so to very useful to
Kerneels, keep your political commentary out of this, please.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of AbsKerneels
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 10:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Unused variables
Hi
Ron,
See Tom Ross's Share presentation slide 21 ...SR1541TR.ppt..it's a simple way
opt(full) + map look for BL=X Hth
Regards
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Sep 20, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo