Seems like it is time for IBM to step up again.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
10/08/2012 10:10:10 AM:
From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 10/08/2012 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
Sent
/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
10/09/2012 02:39:06 AM:
From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 10/09/2012 02:41 AM
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
Sent by: IBM Mainframe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mehrshad Manshadi
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem.
Hi David,
Thanks for your
Of Mehrshad Manshadi
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
Hi David,
Thanks for your useful information.
So The APAR PM43006 will solve our problem? Am I right?
Best regards
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob Schramm
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem.
Considering how data is growing, don't these limitations seem a bit
Rob Schramm wrote:
begin extract
Considering how data is growing, don't these limitations seem a bit
arbitrary? 2**32 or 2**40?
end extract
I suspect that the OP's 2**32 should be, more precisely, 2**32 - 1,
i.e., the capacity of an unsigned fullword. (Where 2**40 comes from
is not so clear,
On 9 Oct 2012 08:16:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Chris Blaicher
wrote:
Are the manuals for SYNCSORT available on-line, especially any for
UNIX. I have fond memories of the power of the version for HP-UX.
Clark Morris
Yes, you could say that, but there are trade-offs.
When dealing with
[mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mehrshad Manshadi
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
Hi David,
Thanks for your useful information.
So The APAR PM43006 will solve our
Hi,
We have a table space with 250 partition and 4,600,000,000 records which it's
have to re partition.
Because of lack space on the DASD we are trying to use Tape on some DD cards as
follows :
//SYSREC DD DSN=TEMPDS.TAPE1,DISP=(MOD,CATLG),
//
-3809
DFSORT/MVSontheweb at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
10/08/2012 08:03:35 AM:
From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 10/08/2012 08:06 AM
Subject: Reorganizing Partition Table Space
D4-Q84357 E8-BASE
ICE052I 0 END OF DFSORT
Best regards
Manshadi
From: David Betten bet...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2012 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem.
You need
SORT FIELDS=(5.0,00028.0,A),FORMAT=BI,FILSZ=E04979426640,
DYNAOC=(SYSDA,04)
RECORD TYPE=V,LENGTH=(00070,00070,00070)
5 billion record, 70 bytes per record, 350GB.
4 SORTWK files, so 350GB / 3 = 120GB per volume.
If you have smaller volumes you will need more of them.
--
Mike A
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
10/08/2012 10:10:10 AM:
From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 10/08/2012 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
14 matches
Mail list logo
