On 5/4/2022 2:45 PM, coasthermit wrote:
Many years back I IPLed my onepak system with RACF disabled to see what
happened.Every access of a resource sent a reply prompt to the console for
YES/NO.It took a while but I eventually got enough of MVS up that I could logon
to TSO/E.I considered
Hey, that was both kinds!
On Thu, May 5, 2022, at 9:03 PM, David Spiegel wrote:
> *flotsam
>
> On 2022-05-05 19:45, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> > Oh my, LOL.
> > About half of ibm-main posts are attempts at humor (many unintentional),
> > and the other half are just pedantic flotsum but that actually
*flotsam
On 2022-05-05 19:45, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Oh my, LOL.
About half of ibm-main posts are attempts at humor (many unintentional), and
the other half are just pedantic flotsum but that actually landed somewhere
else.
On Thu, May 5, 2022, at 5:25 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Alan Altmark
Oh my, LOL.
About half of ibm-main posts are attempts at humor (many unintentional), and
the other half are just pedantic flotsum but that actually landed somewhere
else.
On Thu, May 5, 2022, at 5:25 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
> Alan Altmark wrote, in part:
> >it should attempt to engage a
Alan Altmark wrote, in part:
>it should attempt to engage a human.
So your program calls some system interface, SAF gets involved, responds
"Your call is very important to us.please hold for the next available
agent."? /s
--
On Wed, 4 May 2022 12:50:49 -0400, zMan wrote:
>Someone on r/mainframe asks what SAF does without an ESM. I'm thinking "not
>much", but the last sentence above sort of suggests otherwise--unless "SAF
>either processes security authorization requests directly" mean
.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
https://rsclweb.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of zMan
Sent: 05 May 2022 16:47
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAF without an ESM
Well, sure, you can write your
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAF without an ESM
Well, sure, you can write your own ESM. But that's not SAF doing anything
itself.
Same applies to exits, mentioned elsewhere. As written, that graf sounds
like SAF itself will do some security checking, OR you can buy an ESM and
do more.
On Wed, May 4, 2022
on, some way
> to configure what you have written.
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of zMan
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 9:51 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject:
www.rshconsulting.com
-Original Message-
Date:Thu, 5 May 2022 05:45:53 +0800
From:coasthermit
Subject: Re: SAF without an ESM
Many years back I IPLed my onepak system with RACF disabled to see what
happened.Every access of a resource sent a reply prompt to the console for
YES
for every
access request, but in the end I just built a default RACF data base for that
system to use.Maybe SAF still works the same way.
Original message From: zMan Date:
5/5/22 00:51 (GMT+08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SAF without an
ESM On https://www.ibm.com
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAF without an ESM
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not reply, click links, or open attachments until you verify
the SMTP address (sender @domain.com) next to the display name
to configure what
you have written.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of zMan
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 9:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SAF without an ESM
On https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos-basic
AF either processes
> security authorization requests directly or works with RACF®, or other
> security product, to process them.
Someone on r/mainframe asks what SAF does without an ESM. I'm thinking "not
much", but the last sentence above sort of suggests otherwise--unless "
14 matches
Mail list logo
