Re: SDSF Edit Function Key disappointment

2019-03-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:05:28 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >Lionel Dyck wrote: > >>I've not used SDSF for a number of years but now I am and I have found a >>disconnect between the way SDSF works and the say every other ISPF >>application works when in Edit. > >>When using SJ or SE any user

Re: SDSF Edit Function Key disappointment

2019-03-28 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Lionel Dyck wrote: >I've not used SDSF for a number of years but now I am and I have found a >disconnect between the way SDSF works and the say every other ISPF application >works when in Edit. >When using SJ or SE any user of ISPF Edit will expect F6 to be RCHANGE - but >it isn't. It is defin

Re: SDSF Edit Function Key disappointment

2019-03-28 Thread Blake, Daniel J [CTR]
I bit the bullet. ;-D an Blake -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lionel Dyck Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 7:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SDSF Edit Function Key disappointment I've not used SDSF for a number of years but now

SDSF Edit Function Key disappointment

2019-03-28 Thread Lionel Dyck
I've not used SDSF for a number of years but now I am and I have found a disconnect between the way SDSF works and the say every other ISPF application works when in Edit. When using SJ or SE any user of ISPF Edit will expect F6 to be RCHANGE - but it isn't. It is defined as blank. F5 is define