Slide cursor over relevant portion and hit Reply
In a message dated 1/8/2016 11:21:56 A.M. Central Standard Time,
004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
Sorry, I don't see how to quote a prior message.
--
Sorry, I don't see how to quote a prior message.
This is what worked for me from Charles.
"Divide by 100 -- remainder is hundredths of a second.
Divide quotient by 60 -- remainder is seconds.
Divide quotient by 60 -- remainder is minutes.
Quotient is hours (24 hour clock).
SMFxxDTE is in an am
e: SMFxTME field
That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 03:33
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
That that is is that that is not is no
That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 03:33
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
That that is is that that is not is not?
In a message
Janet Graff wrote:
>That worked. Now I have the time formatted very nicely.
What worked? Please be kind to clarify what worked and what reply/replies
really helped you?
It would really help if the persons who asked for help, also post the results
of success/failures on IBM-MAIN so that future
That that is is that that is not is not?
In a message dated 1/7/2016 7:02:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
"that"?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to li
Which "that"?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Janet Graff
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 5:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
That worked. Now I have the time form
That worked. Now I have the time formatted very nicely.
Thank you!
Janet
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
FREE ListServer http://www.mxg.com/mxg-l_listserver/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Neil Duffee
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
Caveat: with daily digesting
is attempted." John McKown 2015
-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills [mailto:cha...@mcn...org]
Sent: January 5, 2016 19:46
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
Of course, if you have the good Doctor Merrill's most excellent MXG software
then it will do all of this for you and more in b
Ed Finnell wrote:
> TITLE('SMF Type-14 Records') DATE TIME PAGE -
> HEADER('Time') ON(7,4,TM1,E'99:99:99') -
> C'hh:mm:ss' HEADER('Date') ON(11,4,DT3,E'-999') -
DT3? yuck! That's Julian format and so ancient ... ;-)
I prefer this, but then it is just me! From my sample ICETOOL job for SMF ty
Janet Graff wrote:
>What macro would we use to convert TIME BIN to a readable DATE TIME? It
>doesn't look like STCKCONV to CONVTOD take input of a 32-bit unsigned binary.
Others gave you good replies including DFSORT/ICETOOL method and how to
calculate it. Charles Mills gave a good reply too.
nuary 05, 2016 4:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
The SMFxxTME and SMFxxDTE fields are in my experience consistent
representations of *local* time and date on the LPAR represented by the SMFID.
No worries about leap seconds (unless you need to get back to some more
ices in some years.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Janet Graff
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
What macro would we use to convert TIME BIN to a read
Which records are you trying to process? There might be samples on
_www.cbttape.org_ (http://www.cbttape.org) .
DFSORT and SAS/MXG are SMFTIME knowledgeable. From DFSORT Smart Tricks
manual(pg 80).
Likewise, you can use the TOD date and time formats (DC1-3 and TC1-4) and
the ETOD date and
On 2016-01-05 16:38, Janet Graff wrote:
> What macro would we use to convert TIME BIN to a readable DATE TIME? It
> doesn't look like STCKCONV to CONVTOD take input of a 32-bit unsigned binary.
>
Suss out, by trial and error, an affine transformation to convert
32-bit unsigned binary to the 64 (
What macro would we use to convert TIME BIN to a readable DATE TIME? It
doesn't look like STCKCONV to CONVTOD take input of a 32-bit unsigned binary.
Janet
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Thank you to everyone for your help. It turns out my content was correct but
my timing was off. I was filling in the SMFxTME with the correct Time
component of TIME BIN but I was doing it when my server started. I need to
change my code to fill in the SMFxTME with the correct Time component o
Janet Graff wrote:
>We just noticed our product was setting the SMFxTME field inappropriately
>using the TIME BIN macro. What should we be using to set the SMFxTME field?
Please post the TIME BIN macro and all fields/variables used.
Please post the result of that macro and what
er would compute the century!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Janet Graff
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMFxTME field
We just noticed our product was setti
-8260 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Janet Graff
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMFxTME field
Importance: Low
We just noticed
In <3495911068637390.wa.janet.graffyahoo@listserv.ua.edu>, on
02/20/2015
at 01:05 PM, Janet Graff
<004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:
>We just noticed our product was setting the SMFxTME field
>inappropriately using the TIME BIN macro.
Why inappropr
On 2/20/2015 2:05 PM, Janet Graff wrote:
We just noticed our product was setting the SMFxTME field inappropriately using
the TIME BIN macro. What should we be using to set the SMFxTME field?
The doc says
06 06 SMFxTME4binary Time since midnight, in
We just noticed our product was setting the SMFxTME field inappropriately using
the TIME BIN macro. What should we be using to set the SMFxTME field?
The doc says
06 06 SMFxTME4binary Time since midnight, in
hundredths of
24 matches
Mail list logo
