So...I infer, perhaps incorrectly, that the RESTORE job is also doing a
ZONEMERGE for the SDSF zone. If that's the case, it has to do special
processing to make sure that CIFREQ entries are correctly merged with
SYSMOD entries that actually represent installed FMIDs. Can someone
confirm that
I checked with someone in ServerPac design, and this is indeed what's
up. They will look at the alternatives for solving this, including the
one below.
John Eells wrote:
So...I infer, perhaps incorrectly, that the RESTORE job is also doing a
ZONEMERGE for the SDSF zone. If that's the case,
When I google HQX7790 I find this same error in a note dated August 11, 2015
with subject SDSF z/os 2.1 - z/OS upgrade
SET BDY(MVST100) .
GIM20501ISET PROCESSING IS COMPLETE. THE HIGHEST RETURN CODE WAS 00.
UCLIN .
DEL SYSMOD(HQX7790) CIFREQ(
(UI90005,UI90004)
LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SMP/E error in my z/OS 2.1 Serverpac OS212016.
>
> This is the answer from IBM; just in case anyone else might be experiencing
> this:
>
> Due to recently added IFREQs, the ServerPac RESTORE job is not getting
> generated correctly, causing the errors
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gibney, David Allen,Jr
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 4:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMP/E error in my z/OS 2.1 Serverpac OS212016.
When I google HQX7790 I find this same error in a note dated August 11, 2015
with subject SDSF z/os 2.1 - z/OS upgrade
SET BDY
; > On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:49 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: SMP/E error in my z/OS 2.1 Serverpac OS212016.
> >
> > This is the answer from IBM; just in case anyone else might be
> > experiencing
&
On 2016-01-12 15:03, Gibney, David Allen,Jr wrote:
> And also, in the following set of ADDs, it's also there twice.
> ...
Well, if they'd just *alternate* the ADDs with the DELETEs, they'd all work.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN