Subject: Re: SSI update
Hello Sir,
Apology for the confusion, Recently in one of my test system I added a
subsystem to SSI and i have started experiencing recursive abends. After
adding I started seeing some of the STC which were started taking more Real
storage(Which Usually doesn't take much during
Hello All,
I am trying to understand if Dynamic SSI update can overlay the storage.
Could someone please shed some light on dynamic SSI update.
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
12:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SSI update
Hello All,
I am trying to understand if Dynamic SSI update can overlay the storage.
Could someone please shed some light on dynamic SSI update.
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN
to define or change the functional response of a
subsystem.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of mf db
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 12:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SSI update
Hello All,
I am
In
capikfhevlqhxirnrfqqf63rofqa+_ra1d2mmzvcygg+mwnt...@mail.gmail.com,
on 09/11/2013
at 01:02 PM, mf db dbajava...@gmail.com said:
I am trying to understand if Dynamic SSI update can overlay the
storage.
If you provide your own subsystem, it can overlay storage; it doesn't
matter whether you
if Dynamic SSI update can overlay the storage.
Could someone please shed some light on dynamic SSI update.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM
-
From: mf db dbajava...@gmail.com
I am trying to understand if Dynamic SSI update can overlay the storage.
Could someone please shed some light on dynamic SSI update.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
No apology needed.
The problem is with the subsystem you added. You will need to capture the abend
information and analyze it. Look at logrec to see if a record was generated for
it. If not, then you probably need to capture a dump. Or maybe the abend
messages that you are looking at would
