Re: SV: Why is GRS ENQ needed in SMFDUMP program?

2012-07-01 Thread J R
A nagging doubt since my earlier post compelled me to go look at the UCB mapping. It seems that the bit is actually a one-byte count which makes sense for concurrent RESERVE activity. === Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 00:28:04 -0400 From: shmuel+...@patriot.net Subject: Re: SV: Why is GRS ENQ

Re: SV: Why is GRS ENQ needed in SMFDUMP program?

2012-06-30 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In bay145-w28ad40f15a4f1654e89483a3...@phx.gbl, on 06/25/2012 at 09:25 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com said: The RESERVE macro did (still does?) not directly do the hardware reserve. Rather, it set a bit in the UCB to tell the next IO to the unit to prepend a reserve CCW to the channel