Peter/Clark,
Since we are a ISV, we try to intervene ourselves. My issue was on how to
do it. I know LE but I am faced with
we cant just convert to pure HLASM or even threaded C or C++ . So i have to
come up with an alternative solution
that works. We have been using Subpool 231 and it works
The choices are between saving the data yourself as you go, such as by
some sort of checkpoint or other method, or saving the data yourself after
the cancel (for which some sort of TERM=YES ESTAE-type recovery is
necessary) or not allowing the CANCEL (whether by intercepting CANCEL or
making
[Default] On 14 May 2019 11:23:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
idfli...@gmail.com (scott Ford) wrote:
>All:
>
>I need to do some research on how job is cancelled via the Operator , Abend
>S222. I read through some of the Boston share doc of some time ago by Ed,
>Sam and Skip. Its great.
>I
