On 8/5/2013 9:28 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Yes, I personally think it'd be nice if OSA-ICC supported something like
TLS, IPSEC, SSH, or all of the above. Feel free to "ask your IBM
representative."
I assume those that extolled the virtues of OSA-ICC, while scoffing at
me for shying away merel
Joe Messineo writes:
>Well I don't want to complicate things for the operators.
>Right now the console "just comes on" when they IPL the system.
>So the security is the physical computer room. So any
>solution would require it to be seamless for our operations
>staff. I really don't want to add a
Well I don't want to complicate things for the operators. Right now the
console "just comes on" when they IPL the system. So the security is the
physical computer room. So any solution would require it to be seamless for
our operations staff.
I really don't want to add any additional hardw
>
>
> From: Joe Messineo
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
> Date: 08/05/2013 05:52 AM
> Subject:Securing OSA-ICC Consoles
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
>
>
> We have been using OSA-ICC to emulate consoles for several years.This
nia Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Joe Messineo
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 08/05/2013 05:52 AM
Subject: Securing OSA-ICC Consoles
Sent by:IBM Mainframe
We have been using OSA-ICC to emulate consoles for several years.This has
been done on a private network within the data center. We now have the
requirement to monitor the mainframe from a remote site. OSA-ICC does not
have an option to secure the Console traffic from the client to the O
