Re: SyzMAIL/z new features

2014-12-02 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 0765937696197027.wa.brianwestermansyzygyinc@listserv.ua.edu, on 12/01/2014 at 01:25 AM, Brian Westerman brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com said: I wondered how you might look at this request? Sending related SYSOUT seems reasonable, even if it takes a little more work, but sending arbitrary

Re: SyzMAIL/z new features

2014-12-02 Thread Brian Westerman
I want to thank all of you who responded to me on the list and via private email. I compiled the suggestions and we had a strategy meeting today to discuss it. The results were that we will provide any one (or all) of the JES system datasets, or the entire job, but not specific user SYSOUT

Re: SyzMAIL/z new features

2014-12-01 Thread Brian Westerman
That's my point, SyzSPOOL/z already does just that, and to add the capability to SyzMPF/z would place it in competition with our own product. Besides, getting the STEP and MAX condition codes with the runtime details is useful, but to send the entire job just because we can seems to be

SyzMAIL/z new features

2014-11-30 Thread Brian Westerman
Hi, We had several user requests (at least 200) for the automatic StepCC/MaxCC eMail/SMS text product to allow the JES system datasets to be attached to the email, so that besides the stepCC's and MaxCC, the user can receive any or all of the JESJCL, JESMSGLG, and JESYSLG as attachments. I

Re: SyzMAIL/z new features

2014-11-30 Thread Mike Schwab
I would say if they want more than the three system files you just send them the whole job. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Brian Westerman brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com wrote: Hi, We had several user requests (at least 200) for the automatic StepCC/MaxCC eMail/SMS text product to allow the