Re: TSO IKJOPER question how about using iKJEGASI to change / get a new command buffer

2023-05-09 Thread Joseph Reichman
So the > On May 9, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote: > > I could do the same with the sub command exit > >>> On May 9, 2023, at 11:10 AM, Michael Stein wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:37:27AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >>> I am just wondering when using IKJOPER

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Joseph Reichman
I could do the same with the sub command exit > On May 9, 2023, at 11:10 AM, Michael Stein wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:37:27AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >> I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I >> would like to use an example from TSO TEST so

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Michael Stein
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:37:27AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: > I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I > would like to use an example from TSO TEST so I would imagine the '=' of TSO > TEST is an IKJOPER Well, it doesn't work like that... Test prescans the

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Joseph Reichman
Thank you > On May 9, 2023, at 11:02 AM, Tony Harminc wrote: > > On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 15:12, Seymour J Metz wrote: > >> I believe that the optional source tapes for OS/360 and OS/VS2 3.8 are >> archived (CBTTAPE?), so it should be possible to examine the source code >> for TEST. > > > MVS

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Tony Harminc
On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 15:12, Seymour J Metz wrote: > I believe that the optional source tapes for OS/360 and OS/VS2 3.8 are > archived (CBTTAPE?), so it should be possible to examine the source code > for TEST. MVS 3.8 TSO modules can also conveniently be browsed at

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Seymour J Metz
/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joseph Reichman [reichman...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 9:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TSO IKJOPER question Seymour I can only say you

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Mike Schwab
_ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of > Joseph Reichman [reichman...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 7:37 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: TSO IKJOPER question > > Hi > > > &g

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Joseph Reichman
com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 7:37 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: TSO IKJOPER question > > Hi > > > > I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I > would like to use an example from TSO TEST so I would imagine the '=' of

Re: TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Seymour J Metz
(Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joseph Reichman [reichman...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 7:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: TSO IKJOPER question

TSO IKJOPER question

2023-05-09 Thread Joseph Reichman
Hi I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I would like to use an example from TSO TEST so I would imagine the '=' of TSO TEST is an IKJOPER Used to modify storage. The subcommand is '=' Does the subcommand have to be the first operand I mean clearly