Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-17 Thread Cieri, Anthony
sday, May 16, 2019 4:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622 [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown or suspicious senders. *** ]] IEFUTL is exactly the same on both systems. Not sur

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-17 Thread Bill Bishop (TMNA)
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roland Kinsman Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 9:22 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622 I'll find out about that. Would that manifest itself as an S622 abend

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-17 Thread Roland Kinsman
I'll find out about that. Would that manifest itself as an S622 abend? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-17 Thread Carmen Vitullo
19 9:22:26 AM Subject: Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622 I'll find out about that. Would that manifest itself as an S622 abend? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@lists

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-17 Thread Bill Bishop (TMNA)
...@toyota.com Office: (469) 292-5149 Cell: (502) 316-4386 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roland Kinsman Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 9:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-17 Thread Roland Kinsman
IEFUTL is pretty simple, nothing system-specific. It does do a RACROUTE looking for read access to a certain resource, but on both systems, that resource has universal read. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-16 Thread Mark Jacobs
DMZ shouldn't matter. What's the logic in the IEFUTL exit? Is it doing different things based on system? Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-16 Thread Roland Kinsman
IEFUTL is exactly the same on both systems. Not sure if this is helpful, but the system with the short timeout is "in the DMZ" -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-14 Thread Roland Kinsman
Thanks, I'll check -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-14 Thread Mark Jacobs
Different IEFUTL exits? Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, May 14, 2019 11:52 AM, Roland Kinsman wrote: > I have two LPARs, each

TSO Reconnect ABEND=S622

2019-05-14 Thread Roland Kinsman
I have two LPARs, each with identical contents in TSOKEY00. They specify RECONLIM=10. On one of the systems, you can reconnect to an inactive TSO session after several days of inactivity, I'm not sure how long. On that LPAR, ABEND=S622 does occur, but not very often. On the other LPAR,