From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nai, Dean
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape Problem
Hi Sam,
Just got you message. The problem was fixed but this morning it came back.
I’ll check with IBM an
Hi Sam,
Just got you message. The problem was fixed but this morning it came back.
I’ll check with IBM and get back to you later today. Thanks for all your help.
Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New
Hi Folks,
I once wrote a package to audit tape differences between the IBM
3494 VTS and CA-1. It is on CBT Tape File 519. www.cbttape.org CBT
file. It converts the tape inventory of CA-1 and the VTS to a common
format, and compares them, reporting discrepancies. Hope it helps.
This
ut how/why the robot lost track of
which slot a tape was in.
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Nai, Dean
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Fri, Jan 17, 2020 1:16 pm
Subject: Re: Tape problem
These are physical tape. No VTS.
Dean Nai
On 1/16/20, 8:01 PM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion
770I first, and then the CBR3769I quickly after
>>- that would be very strange and I would recommend contacting IBM.
>>
>>Russell Witt
>>CA 1 Architect
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
to:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of Brian Fraser
>Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 3:12 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Tape problem
>
>>> you forget to update the ROBTY and VENDOR fields
>
>I never update those fields.
>I just insert new volumes a
16, 2020 3:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape problem
>> you forget to update the ROBTY and VENDOR fields
I never update those fields.
I just insert new volumes as scratch and the library takes care of everything.
Unless it's handled by the INSERT exit?
Brian
On Thu, 16 J
>> you forget to update the ROBTY and VENDOR fields
I never update those fields.
I just insert new volumes as scratch and the library takes care of
everything.
Unless it's handled by the INSERT exit?
Brian
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 15:47, Brian Westerman
wrote:
> It's not normally a CA-1 caused
It's not normally a CA-1 caused problem. This is "normally" caused when tapes
are added to the VTS and you forget to update the ROBTY and VENDOR fields so
tht when a tape is used (and scratched) that CA-1 can tell the VTS and OAM that
it's again available.
Someone always forgets to do this at
You can run the CA-1 CTSSYNC utility, to synchronize the TCDB from the TMC.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nai, Dean
Sent: 15 January 2020 18:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Tape problem
Anyone ever
>
>Lizette
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>Nai, Dean
>Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:31 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Tape problem
>
>Anyone ever run into a problem where the CA-1 catalog and t
Are you using IBM VTS, emc vts, other tape appliance
I have found the CA 1 Support team to be very helpful.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nai, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 10:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Tape
Anyone ever run into a problem where the CA-1 catalog and the volcat seem to be
out of sync? We keep getting the below messages and aren’t able to eject tapes.
Thought it was 3494 hardware related by IBM doesn’t thing so. Any suggestions?
CBR3770I Volume T00xxx misplaced in library TAPELIB1
13 matches
Mail list logo
