Re: Testing (was 'Tesing') A SubSystem Initialization Routine

2014-04-14 Thread Peter Hunkeler
How about running your initialization routine from a job or started task instead of via SSI definition? You would need a small driver that calls your init routine from that job or STC. You could even write a small program to cleanup the environment before rerunning the init job/STC. Once

Re: Testing (was 'Tesing') A SubSystem Initialization Routine

2014-04-13 Thread John Gilmore
Whether your assessment is correct correct upon whether you are willing to make use of EJ's suggestion that you zap (presumably) the last letter of your routine's name to employ a sequence 'stem'.'A', 'stem'.'B', . . . . ,'stem.'Z', 'stem.'@', 'stem.'#', 'stem'.'$' of 29 routine names, one per

Re: Testing (was 'Tesing') A SubSystem Initialization Routine

2014-04-13 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 12:02 -0400 on 04/13/2014, you wrote about Re: Testing (was 'Tesing') A SubSystem Initialization Routi:%0D I'm not quite sure what Robert Rosenberg means by a 'static location', but a sequence of directed loads to tghe same reused storage obtained once dynamically would meet your needs.