eived: Saturday, 07 Mar 2015, 7:54AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Subject: Re: US DST this weekend
I believe that, at the "el cheapo" end of the scale, the term "atomic clock" is
[ab]used to describe display devices that employ an NTP client that communica
...@hotmail.com]
Received: Saturday, 07 Mar 2015, 7:54AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Subject: Re: US DST this weekend
I believe that, at the "el cheapo" end of the scale, the term "atomic clock" is
[ab]used to describe display devices that employ an NTP clien
(shudder) the device consists of setting the
switch that requests that DST be honored, or not.
===
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:19:18 -0600
> From: 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: US DST this weekend
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> On
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:19:18 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Yeah, right. An atomic clock for $18.99. But I guess they wouldn't let them
>put it on the Internet if it weren't true.
C'mon Paul - I bet they've *all* got atoms in them ;-)
Shane ...
-
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:28:43 -0500, Ed Finnell wrote:
> http://www.walmart.com/search/?query=atomic%20clocks%20indoor&typeahead=atomic%20clock
>
(URL repaired. You need to get a better mailer.)
>
Yeah, right. An atomic clock for $18.99. But I guess they wouldn't let them
put it on the Internet i
http://www.walmart.com/search/?query=atomic%20clocks%20indoor&typeahead=atom
ic%20clock
In a message dated 3/6/2015 4:42:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
o I'm skeptical about "atomic clocks"; that devices with nanosecond
accuracy
would
On 2015-03-06 15:08, Ed Finnell wrote:
> Originally the DST change was last Sat. in Apr and first Sat in Nov. At
> least two clocks have this burned in and have to be goosed before and after
> the new dates.
>
o "Saturday"? I've never heard of the boundary's being other than on Sunday,
in
Originally the DST change was last Sat. in Apr and first Sat in Nov. At
least two clocks have this burned in and have to be goosed before and after
the new dates.
In a message dated 3/6/2015 4:03:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
What
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:00:19 -0500, Ed Finnell wrote:
>Think the computers are OK. Several Atomic clocks are preprogrammed for the
> old algorithm and have to be bumped. Thought we were going to get rid of
>it?
>
What "old algorithm"? Cite?
-- gil
---
Think the computers are OK. Several Atomic clocks are preprogrammed for the
old algorithm and have to be bumped. Thought we were going to get rid of
it?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send e
10 matches
Mail list logo
