On 06/18/2013 05:38 AM, Adam wrote:
We have a system where two RACF userids are defined with the same uid. (This
is deliberate and is intended to simplify access using NFS and other OS.)
My question is about the username value that is displayed in response to the
id command (and as file
Yes, it is becoming well known that doing this look up, when the UID or GID
is not unique, seems to always result in the wrong answer.
Which makes me curious. And perhaps a solution. Very little work in z/OS
runs without a ESM (like RACF) id and one or more active groups. So why
doesn't the id
We have a system where two RACF userids are defined with the same uid. (This
is deliberate and is intended to simplify access using NFS and other OS.)
My question is about the username value that is displayed in response to the
id command (and as file owner).
The same applies to use of
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:38:56
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unix ID command and username value
We have a system where two RACF userids are defined with the same uid. (This
is deliberate
Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:38:56
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unix ID command and username value
We have a system where two RACF userids are defined with the same
: Unix ID command and username value
We have a system where two RACF userids are defined with the same uid.
(This is deliberate and is intended to simplify access using NFS and
other
OS.)
My question is about the username value that is displayed in response to
the id command
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unix ID command and username value
We have a system where two RACF userids are defined with the same uid.
(This is deliberate and is intended to simplify access using NFS and other
OS.)
My question is about the username value that is displayed in response to
the id
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:30:46 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
... This makes me suspect that the current IBM
implementation of associating the home path with a RACF userid profile
rather than somehow with a UID-related profile violates the spirit if
not the letter of the UNIX standards.
Yup.
Thanks - great answer. It's basically what I suspected (or rather, feared).
So for the supplementary question, what command _should_ be used to identify
the current user, as known to RACF?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
If your RACF data base is at AIM 3 (strongly recommended), then RACF itself
enforces a unique UID on RACF user ids and unique a GID on RACF group ids.
But it will allow duplicates if the SHARED parameter is specified on the
ADDUSER/ADDGROUP command.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Paul Gilmartin
10 matches
Mail list logo
