Re: Unlike data sets concatenation - revised 3

2023-05-01 Thread Michael Stein
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 08:26:42AM -0500, Pierre Fichaud wrote: > I have provided the DCB in source and dumped it just before the OPEN. > . 000183 INFILE DCB DDNAME=INFILE, >*00164000 . > . 000184

Re: Unlike data sets concatenation - revised 3

2023-05-01 Thread Michael Stein
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 08:26:42AM -0500, Pierre Fichaud wrote: > I have provided the DCB in source and dumped it just before the OPEN. > 1st data set in the concatenation : > The JCL has just the DSN and DISP. > . > > .

Re: Unlike data sets concatenation - revised 3

2023-05-01 Thread Hobart Spitz
I don't see a question, so I'm responding to what I think you want. It has long been true that BUFSIZE defaults to the largest available BLKSIZE The requirement was written in the 1980s. (It might depend on your access method.) So, I very much doubt the the BLISIZE difference is the problem.

Unlike data sets concatenation - revised 3

2023-05-01 Thread Pierre Fichaud
I have provided the DCB in source and dumped it just before the OPEN. 1st data set in the concatenation : Data Set Name . . . . : PIERRE.VB200. . .