On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:51:17 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:50:09 +, Edward Finnell wrote:
>
>>All of Lionel's software is at www.lbdsoftware.com
>>
>>IPLINFO is a Mark Zelden creation
>>athttp://www.mzelden.com/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txtIn a message dated 12/18/2019
Hi Json,
Start with SYS1.SAMPLIB(SPPINST). it demonstrate how to perform syntax
verification for several parmlib members.
I think that you better consider change control over comparison of active
configuration with the static one using product such as event action.
Sorry for misleading. IPL
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:50:09 +, Edward Finnell wrote:
>All of Lionel's software is at www.lbdsoftware.com
>
>IPLINFO is a Mark Zelden creation
>athttp://www.mzelden.com/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txtIn a message dated 12/18/2019
>6:31:25 PM
>
I see: http://mzelden.com/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txt
> ...
All of Lionel's software is at www.lbdsoftware.com
IPLINFO is a Mark Zelden creation
athttp://www.mzelden.com/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txtIn a message dated 12/18/2019
6:31:25 PM Central Standard Time, ibmm...@foxmail.com writes:
I couldn't find Lionel Dyke's IPLINFO,could you tell where I can down
Well, there is the IBM Command IPLINFO, and it might show the values
you want to capture.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.ieag100/d3ipl.htm
But I think you want to check out
http://mzelden.com/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txt which is also posted to
There are a lot of system interfaces for returning settings; I'd advise using
such commands as DISPLAY and QUERY only when there isn't a more stable way to
get the data.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
Dear ITschak
It is great that you do that in your production!
I couldn't find Lionel Dyke's IPLINFO,could you tell where I can down it?
You are right that we need to parse the the output from the display and
compare same value in the parmlib. I know some Python . In Python we could
Tracking changes (with a suitable tool) might be feasible. What you'll miss,
however, is changes to product defaults. No one specifies every possible value.
Sometimes the vendor changes a default or more often adds a new
parameter/default that will not show up in a simple comparison with your
You better track changes to system datasets with a product such as
EventAction, instead of trying to perform a compare active to passive
configuration. There are some exceptions to what you monitor. TCPIP OBEY
command allows you to specify your private library, but most others are
quite known
We've had enough bad weather around the world that raining on yet another
parade seems cruel and unusual. Nonetheless, I have to opine that this quest is
hopeless. So far I've not seen any product named. Even as mature and
well-defined a product as JES does not provide its own parameter sanity
Jason,
We do that in our product (not selling you anything), and it is not easy.
some of the parameters are not displayed in the command and need deeper
investigation. In general, you do not compare syntax, but tokens. for
example, you need to parse the the output from the display and compare
ISPF Skeleton?
___
Al Ferguson | mailto:afergu...@neptunescove.org
Milwaukee, WI USA | http://www.neptunescove.org
Dulcius ex Asperis
> On 18 December 2019, at 14:18, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:43:18
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:43:18 -0600, Jason Cai wrote:
>
>You gave me many good ideas,many thanks!
>
>We want to develop this tool to compare them.
>Depend on system and subsystem,we could issue many D or $D command.
> Because there are mash of these output and the format of output is
Dear all
You gave me many good ideas,many thanks!
We want to develop this tool to compare them.
Depend on system and subsystem,we could issue many D or $D command.
Because there are mash of these output and the format of output is
different with the parmlib members,how to compare
That's a tool waiting to be developed.
D OMVS,F
D PROG LINKLIST
D PROG APF
Plus any others...
mash the output of those and compare to the parmlib members.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 12:08 PM Mike Schwab
wrote:
> Search the system log for the updating USERID and select the commands
> you
Search the system log for the updating USERID and select the commands
you entered and search for the static location of those values?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:48 AM Jason Cai wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> After some paramters were changed dynamically , these paremeters didn't be
> changed in members
Showzos (CBTTAPE) will report some current values
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of retired mainframer
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 4:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: how to compare active parameter with the parameter in
>
It probably depends on which parameters for what subsystem. JES2 has a series
of $D commands to display the current parameters which you can then compare to
the text in the parameter member. z/OS has a similar set of operands to the
DISPLAY command that somewhat mirror the various parameter
Most if not all the changes I have done with the SET Command. The one I have
always
Changed is the LNKLST, however I have always been very careful to LNKLST for
the next IPL.
Otherwise you are doomed to keep redoing the change.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
There is a product called Image Focus from NewEra Software that has that
capability.
Alan Schwartz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Hi all
After some paramters were changed dynamically , these paremeters didn't be
changed in members .
Next IPL, we will lost these changes.
Is there any way to compare active parameters with the parameters in members?
Any thoughts/comments/suggestions would be greatly appreciated
Best
21 matches
Mail list logo
