Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-23 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In CAE1XxDE+7LU3kKQt2pEgJVyNR2U7-=st1ejzi9abaxyuavr...@mail.gmail.com, on 07/22/2012 at 09:12 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said: Specifying the RENT option when you assemble your HLASM subroutines instructs the HLASM to check your code for non-reentrant constructs, and it finds many but

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-23 Thread Frank Swarbrick
! Frank From: John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 7:12 AM Subject: Re: re-entrant modules and the binder I am not sure that I fully understand exactly what you want to do or the exact sequence in which you

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-23 Thread Frank Swarbrick
and the binder At 09:13 -0700 on 07/22/2012, Charles Mills wrote about Re: re-entrant modules and the binder:   and it finds many but not quite all of them.  Basically, it finds ST  1,FOO where FOO is defined in the CSECT something like FOO  DC  F'0' but it does not find things like

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-23 Thread Frank Swarbrick
: Monday, July 23, 2012 2:56 PM Subject: Re: re-entrant modules and the binder I hadn't noticed the issue with PDS load modules versus PDSE program objects.  We currently are placing them in PDSs, but as we now use basic sysplex PDSE sharing we are going to soon want to convert to PDSE.  I'm going

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-23 Thread John Gilmore
Tony Harminc wrote: begin extract It is, rather, a matter of discipline in managing assembler object output, and this can be helped by processing these outputs one at a time with the Binder, storing them as stub load modules or Program Objects, and marking them appropriately at that first partial

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-22 Thread John Gilmore
I am not sure that I fully understand exactly what you want to do or the exact sequence in which you want to do it. Your objective is, however, clear: You want to be able to use the CICS RENTPGM=PROTECT facility. If 1) you specify this option for a CICS application program (AP) and 2) CICS

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-22 Thread Charles Mills
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: re-entrant modules and the binder I am not sure that I fully understand exactly what you want to do or the exact sequence in which you want to do it. Your objective is, however, clear: You want to be able to use the CICS RENTPGM=PROTECT facility. If 1) you specify

Re: re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-22 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 09:13 -0700 on 07/22/2012, Charles Mills wrote about Re: re-entrant modules and the binder: and it finds many but not quite all of them.  Basically, it finds ST 1,FOO where FOO is defined in the CSECT something like FOO DC F'0' but it does not find things like the following

re-entrant modules and the binder

2012-07-19 Thread Frank Swarbrick
I am making changes to make re-entrant our assembler routines that are called by COBOL programs.  I'm trying to decide what are the best default options for the program binder.  It appears that if the option REUS=RENT is given to the binder then the executable (PO or load module) is given the