Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-18 Thread Marna WALLE
Mark, It sounds like you might have a somewhat ongoing requirement to have z/OSMF Lite to test your products with, until such time as you feel your customers have moved up to a more full z/OSMF system. This could be a case where you'd want to have another z/OSMF server configured separately fro

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-17 Thread Michael Brennan
0 7:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite" [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender.] On 3/16/2020 1:28 PM, Jousma, David wrote: > Did something change with the PARML

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-17 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
On 3/16/2020 1:28 PM, Jousma, David wrote: Did something change with the PARMLIB Plugin statement usage? I know early on, once a plugin was added in parmlib it was activated and simply removing the plugin from parmlib definition didn’t actually remove it from use or make it invisible. Seems l

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-16 Thread Mark Jacobs
me Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > Marna WALLE > > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 12:25 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite" > > CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL > > DO NOT open attachments or click on links f

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-16 Thread Jousma, David
49546 616.653.8429  |  fax: 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Marna WALLE Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 12:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite" **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-16 Thread Mark Jacobs
Thanks again. When we had a fuller function z/OSMF up under z/OS 2.4 last weekend I used the Security Configuration Assistant to resolve any problems in that area. We're a software development company, and our developers wanted a basic stripped down z/OSMF instance to ensure that our products t

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-16 Thread Marna WALLE
Mark, You already have *more* than what they are asking. If they want Lite, I'd say that it is there with more. If you don't like a specific plug-in and don't want to use it anymore, by all means do not include its activation anymore. But if they wanted Lite, and you have a decent selection

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-16 Thread Mark Jacobs
Thanks. That was what I had thought too, but it wasn't obvious based on reading the manuals. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday,

Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-16 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
On 3/15/2020 2:35 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote: I've read the manuals, but can't figure out how to convert a full function z/OSMF environment to the lite version. Is this even possible, and if so can anyone point me to the relevant documentation? Thanks. I'm guessing this is not a scenario the z/OSMF t

z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"

2020-03-15 Thread Mark Jacobs
We have configured full function z/OSMF environments on older releases of z/OS for our developers to build/test interfaces to it from our own products. On our z/OS 2.4 system the developers have asked for a z/OSMF Lite environment to be made available there, once again to test our products so th