Hi:
I have said this before. At a IBM class (here in Chicago) The
instructor told us (SERVPAC CLASS) that the goal of IBM was to
eliminate the systems programmer.
Now hows does that make everyone on the list feel?
Ed
On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:36 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Disclaimer: I
I feel fine. I was told the same thing 35 years ago.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF audit (was Re: WLM in batch
in batch?)
I feel fine. I was told the same thing 35 years ago.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF audit (was Re: WLM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:25 PM
I was told that System Programming would be reduced to PARMLIB updates. Circa
1981.
And..
In a previous job as a CSR for an ISV, we got a new boss. In
Disclaimer: I (or we) don't have z/OSMF and z/OS v2.1, maybe next year, when we
are deemed not be naughty SysOps... ;-)
Cheryl Walker wrote:
But the reason to go to z/OSMF is not because people want cheap labor, but
because it's simply better (at least in 2.1).
John McKown is talking about
