Thank you all for your replies.
It appears that z/OSMF NCA is, as we say, the best thing since sliced
bread, but many do not like sliced bread.
Our configuration is not typical because the system is used to test a
SSL/TLS application and developers need to test z/OS servers and clients
with
I also use manual modification and it works fine.
NCA in the other hand seems daunting to me. A question and answer format
like zCX would be far better IMHO.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 7:05 AM Roberto Halais
wrote:
> We are using manual modifications. Before, we used the Windows application
> whi
On 10/26/2020 12:21 PM, Keith Gooding wrote:
Is anyone using this to maintain AT-TLS policies or any other policies ?
Any views on NCA vs manual editing of the policy file ?
When I first encountered AT-TLS I used the Windows version to generate a simple
policy file for one type of application
We are using manual modifications. Before, we used the Windows application
which was excellent.
We tried z/OSMF NCA but don't like it.
Maybe IBM will force us to use it.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:21 PM Keith Gooding <
034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Is anyone using this
iorko
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Keith Gooding
Sent: 26 October 2020 16:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/osmf Network Configuration Assistant
This mail originated from outside our organisation -
034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Is anyone using this to maintain AT-TLS policies or any other policies ?
Any views on NCA vs manual editing of the policy file ?
When I first encountered AT-TLS I used the Windows version to generate a simple
policy file for one type of application and thereafter did manual edits to the
policy
