Re: Question About ATTACHX and ECB

What is missing from the OP is just when he has looked at the ECB. Given that it has an "RB address" it almost certainly has the "wait bit" on. It has not yet been posted. So why is there a question? Once the ECB is posted it will have the value documented. The ECB is posted when the attached

Re: z/VM Compatibility query

>>> On 10/1/2016 at 08:34 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote: > Novell reports that SLES Novell hasn't been the authoritative channel for information about SUSE since mid-2011. Both www.suse.com and scc.suse.com are where people should be looking for information about SUSE Linux

Re: Friday OTT : DOS vs Windows performance

Thanks for that - yes, I know. However, the ASM program uses only register and 'immediate', not storage-storage, instructions (RR and RI, but no RX and SS etc.) in its inner and outer loops (LOOP2 and LOOP1). It does store/retrieve (PUSH, POP) data on the stack to save/retrieve intermediate

Re: RFE 73512 - "Better use of ISPF screen names in SDSF"

On 2016-10-01 10:35, Robert Prins wrote: LOG: Display Filter View Print Options Help SDSF SYSLOG 7910.101 SYS1 SYS1 09/30/2016 0W <=== or ST: Display Filter View Print Options Help

Re: Friday OTT : DOS vs Windows performance

On 10/01/2016 06:24 AM, Robert Prins wrote: > On 2016-10-01 01:59, CM Poncelet wrote: >> 't is Friday, so here we go again. >> >> I wrote the following in Intel assembler in the 1990's to check the >> CPU-cycles >> performance of DOS vs Windows 3.1 (if memory serves), using a 486/33Mhz >>