Hi Quasar,
Suggest you to get aquainted with ABC of system programming and Z/os
architecture. Otherwise many question would get spawned without a basic
idea.
Peter
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Quasar Chunawala
quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com wrote:
*Hi Mike and everyone else on the list - *
Dear All,
Just a vary off and vary on made the volumes back to normal, but not sure
which situation made these volumes with no VTOC info. Dasd were part of
sysplex and shared across the LPAR.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
In
Quasar:
To begin, MFT is pretty ancient (although I was a sysprog for its
predecessor, SSS - OS/360 release 2). Much has changed since MFT,
although much remains the same. In MFT, there were no ASCBs, as there
were no address spaces, which didn't appear until MVS, where every job,
TSO user
In
CA+Myz1X=YFsEu43JaGc7W5Nss2Rfhs_ovr=swfe2cww0j6e...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/18/2012
at 01:36 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
I have done some reading from the MFT manual.
1. Which MFT manual?
2. TSO started as an OS/360 option for MVT, not for MFT.
1. Every
Hi Mulder-san,
Thank you very much for your information.
The code change had been made in z/OS V1.10.
After that release, we cannot trace ENQ/DEQ by GTF SVC trace.
I'm going to try to trace it by component trace you suggested.
Again, thank you a lot.
Minoru Massaki (M*M)
2012/11/13 Jim
*Hi Mike and Schmuel - *
*
*
Thank you very much for the clarification, and things are quite clear to me
now. I will try and find my way into MVS control blocks, and maybe read a
bit of the redbooks too, as you have recommended. Oh and by the ways
Schmuel, the MFT manual I was referring to is *
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#30 Regarding Time Sharing
oh, old presentation at fall atlantic share meeting in 1968
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18
on MFT14 CP67. CP67 had been installed in the univ last week of
Jan68. Univ. continued to run OS/360 (in 360/65 mode on
I installed an upgrade of Flash Player, yesterday, unattended.
I now have GOOGLE CHROME instead of FireFox.
I know this is off-topic to the lists I've cross-posted to but I think the
warning is appropriate, for those who care.
I, personally, don't like CHROME.
And, I don't know (for sure) that
PS: it was only my desk-top short-cuts to specific web sites. NOT the 'main'
ICON on my desk-top.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNeil eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Sender: CICS List cic...@listserv.uga.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012
That is why I DONT do automatic updates. You have to uncheck the
axiliary installs or you get extra software.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I installed an upgrade of Flash Player, yesterday, unattended.
I now have GOOGLE CHROME instead of FireFox.
I
Shouldn't have to go to the trouble of backing out their 'help'!
If I'd wanted CHROME, I'd have kept it years ago!
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Southern Ontario too but automatic updates is off, but missed the teeny tiny
little checkbox not to install chrome.
Am I wrong, is google becoming a nasty player?
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Yes!
BAD DEFAULT!!
Why should I have to ask not to install/upgrade something I don't have?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:55:33 -0500, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Am I wrong, is google becoming a nasty player?
No. Their motto is, Do no evil!
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hi,
I have RESMGR exit for a asid other than my own the code is running from
sp=227,LOC=31 but doesn't seem to be getting control
The doc says the resmgr exit runs out of master does that mean that the
storage I obtain for the resmgr exit to run should have an
Alet pointing to master
you buy the Sunday Toronto Star too:-)
- Original Message -
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: Ot: GOOGLE Chrome
And, you believe?
NYT reported, today, they're under
In
CA+Myz1Udc_9ddoR=6LpXkA=9jak+xap2fya9hccvpwkmzk0...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/18/2012
at 11:18 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
*Hi Mike and Schmuel - *
That's Shmuel!
GC27-6939-10_MFT_Guide_R21.7_Mar72
IBM System/3S0 Operating System MVT Guide OS Release 21,
In 8398516554192612.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/18/2012
at 07:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:55:33 -0500, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Am I wrong, is google becoming a nasty player?
No. Their motto is, Do no evil!
I thought that it was Do,
On 18 Nov 2012 16:41:41 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Shouldn't have to go to the trouble of backing out their 'help'!
If I'd wanted CHROME, I'd have kept it years ago!
On any install/update check carefully to see what other products the
vendor has checked for installation. I think
FWIW:
It's important to delete your Google browsing history before March 1
when Google's new privacy policy comes into effect in order to limit
Google's ability to track and record your every move online. The process
is simple. Follow the steps below:
1. Go to the google homepage and sign
Yes
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:06:05
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe
Yes, but.
Obscurity is bad!
I'm supposedly an expert.
What about my (in their 80's) parents?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi Folks,
I don't want to stir things up any more, and I think that everyone
has come to the following conclusion: If you want to be an unauthorized
program and look at some UCB-related control blocks without changing
them, and you don't mind that you may get an erroneous result once in
Dear all
We want to use 12x IFB links . Could you tell us how to implememnt 2 CIB
CHPIDs defined on the same AID port in HCD.
Could you give us a IOCP statements sample? Thanks a lot!
Below is the IOCP of1 CIB CHPIDs defined on 1 AID port .
CHPID PATH=(CSS(0),F3),SHARED,
24 matches
Mail list logo
