W dniu 2013-05-20 18:42, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
Windows make work until the disk is full. And that is what we want!
I don't think so.
Windows, in general, is a dedicated single user system. This philosophy is fine
in that environment.
Single user system?
What about Windows SERVERS?
Including
We at Longpela Expertise have created a new website:
http://www.lookupmainframesoftware.com. This is a list of mainframe-related
software. We've included our take on what each does, categories, vendors, a bit
of history, and similar products. What we're hoping to do is provide a tool to
Slightly drifting topic:
could it be that all this mess is responsible for z/OS file I/O not being
able to compete with (for example) Unix file I/O on different platforms?
We have a large application which needs high volumes of read only data.
In Unix and Windows environment, this data comes
It is difficult to accurately predict unannounced IBM price increases and
unannounced product release dates. Both of which, over a 2-3 year ELA, will
happen. Is z/OS v2 going to carry a price increase? AFAIK, that hasn't been
announced, but to plan for a 2 or 3 year ELA at this point I need
Good stuff. Thanks, David.
Also, thanks for your STCK(E) converter.
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/toolsTOD.php Have used that from time to
time.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Stephens
Sent:
How about data striping?
snip
Now, to save CPU, we tried the Unix/Windows solution on z/OS too. The result
was: the CPU time was 25 % less, but elapsed time was significantly higher, due
to waits on the file I/O - although there was not much file I/O - most of it
was reduced by the main
On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:55:51 +0200, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Slightly drifting topic:
We use fseek / ftell / fread to do the file I/O. The files are normal
sequential
OS files.
Sounds like the worst of both worlds. Have you tried it with normal
z/OS UNIX files? The kernel may do the caching
On Tue, 21 May 2013 01:03:33 -0400, Scott Ford wrote:
First of all, been around a block a few thousand times..it's irresponsible
from the standpoint of publishing how to do it. I wouldn't do this or even
consider doing it ...but that's me
WTF!? If there were a real threat it would be
Would anyone know why the WLM SERVER status keeps changing from YES to NO?
We have other tasks defined with the same SrvClass CIC_AORP and they are always
set to
SERVER YES. Does it have anything to do with the actual work load being done by
the task?
This is a CICS test region and we are trying
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
begin extract
I've found that for large numbers of small files z/OS UNIX files
vastly outperform legacy data sets. The allocate/open/close/free
overhead is brutal.
/end extract
My measurements confirm this, but when these small files are moved [as
members] into a single
Here, as is not always my wont, I find myself in strong agreement with
Paul Gilmartin.
Security via obscurity---Let's not talk about this; it may go away;
and we certainly don't want anyone else to know about it---is a
delusionary notion in all but the very short term. (There is a case
to be
Hello,
We'll be testing a Luminex tapeless solution in our mainframe environment in
the next couple of months and just wondering if any of you out there have gone
through this type of implementation. If so, any problems encountered migrating
the HSM or TSM tape date to this new hardware?
There are many ways to improve I/O for sequential files. My own
experience suggests that the use of BUFNO= and NCP= is exiguous and
should not be.
Comparison shopping is unlikely to be helpful. These problems need to
be addressed directly taking low-level measurements: To be told that
one has
On 5/21/13, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Gil,
You have your opinion and I have mine. Lets leave it at that.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On May 21, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On
Hervey,
Please post your observations. We are currently looking at various tape
solutions for Mainframe and I will be interested to see how Luminex works
for you.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hervey
We already have improvements to cut the open/close/free overhead.
The ca. 800 little tables are put into 8 large containers, which have
a (sort of) directory at the beginning, so that there is only one open
for the container. The open is done only once, and the containers stay
open throughout the
Q1. Anybody knows a price of the converter?
Q2. How is it looks like? I mean how many ports are available on FICON
and ESCON side, etc.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego
Is there a way by searching storage (RCT,RMCT,call IWMQVS) to now at a specific
time if a lpar is capped ?
For lpars in the same group capacity (all cp shared, no hard lpar capping)
Thanks
Bernard
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
BTW:
for another customer (also z/OS based), we put all the data in a data
space,
using a 3rd party system that the other customer provided. No problem
there.
For Windows server, the application runs multi-threaded, and the cache data
of the table system needs to be serialized; this is done
Most likely the level of activity within the region.
Server status, IIRC, is set by the monitored transactions flowing through the
region.
Check the WLM Planning Guide, or the relevant CICS docs.
HTH,
snip
Would anyone know why the WLM SERVER status keeps changing from YES to NO?
We have
I would think HSM would have the same issues regardless of the virtual
tape system used. We have an MDL -
As I remember, we set up a new esoteric to use with the MDL. So UNITNAME
had to be changed.
We used a tape size of 40GB's for the MDL.
We changed RECYCLEPERCENT(5). So as not to
John and Gil,
I am not trying to argue with anyone or take this personally ...
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On May 21, 2013, at 10:06 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/21/13, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 08:24:41 -0400, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Good stuff. Thanks, David.
Also, thanks for your STCK(E) converter.
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/toolsTOD.php Have used that from time to
time.
Charles
The STCK converter is not handling leap seconds. If you
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 07:14 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Please post your observations [...] Luminex
We didn't buy anybody's solution, but seriously flirted with Luminex
last year. Art Tolsma was generous with his time at SHARE, which made
me interested to begin with, and Dave Tolsma was open
I don't consider the article useless.
The take away should be: if you don't lock down your FTP(only) users so
that they can't submit jobs then they might do things that you didn't
expect. Also, you should secure your system so that arbitrary jobs cannot
bind to TCP ports.
Kirk,
Agreed ...firewalls can be breached too
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On May 21, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
I don't consider the article useless.
The take away should be: if you don't lock down
Kirk,
You have found graces, if not perhaps saving ones. My objection to
this piece was not so much to its content, which was banal, as it was
to its title, which was misleading and, I suspect, meretricious too.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:30:41 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
My measurements confirm this, but when these small files are moved [as
members] into a single PDSE things change dramatically. The UNIX
times are 1.47-3.07 times higher: To avoid spurious exactitude let us
just say significantly higher.
The new mantra: Marketing, Marketing, Marketing has replaced the old
Location, Location, Location.
hacking in the title will get more hits than a title such as A way
to use FTP to get a UNIX shell prompt on z/OS
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:30 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Kirk,
On 5/21/2013 4:14 AM, Scott Chapman wrote:
Is z/OS v2 going to carry a price increase? AFAIK, that hasn't been announced,
but to plan for a 2 or 3 year ELA at this point I need to plan for what that
price increase might be and when we might migrate to it.
Good question in light of IBM's
On Tue, 21 May 2013 10:06:12 -0500, Bill Godfrey wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 08:24:41 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
Also, thanks for your STCK(E) converter.
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/toolsTOD.php Have used that from time to
time.
The STCK converter is not handling leap seconds. If you
I did a Luminex implementation. .Contact me off list if you want some
information on it.
Doug
Doug Fuerst
Principal Consultant
BK Associates
718.921.2620
917.572.7364
d...@bkassociates.net
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
All list,
I need find the generation of dump created by the HSM.
I used the LIST COPYPOOL command, but I didn't get to see the generation.
Which command I'll can to use?
Can someone I help me?
Thank you.
Helio Jose Da Silva
I agree with everything you've said, except the Ice storms. They may form
some ice in winter, but not ice storms, that would be a once in a life time
event. Snow occurs every 20 years for so. You may be thinking of
Gainesville, GA.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Timothy Sipples
All list,
I need find the generation of dump created by the HSM.
I used the LIST COPYPOOL command, but I didn't get to see the generation.
Which command I'll can to use?
Can someone I help me?
Thank you.
Helio Jose Da Silva
--
In your SYS1.PARMLIB library there's a member called COMMNDnn the nn is
equal to a number you select, mine is 00. In that member COMMND00 there's a
libr that reads something like this:
COM='DD NAME=*PBSB1*.DUMP.DLYYMMDD..TLHHMMSS..JOBNAME..SSEQ'
The PBSB1 is the HLQ used for dumps at my shop.
Hello
I'm trying to bring up a tcp ip connection in an ancient OS/390 2.5 to
recover some files.
My home address is 201.56.73.235 (this is a valid internet address). I'm
having trouble
with two next parms that are Gateway and Defaultnet.
When I code folowing definitions I can connect from
Perhaps taxes are lower in other counties within the state, but Alachua county
(which is where Gainesville is located) has some of the highest property taxes.
Only 50% of the property in Alachua county is taxable as of 2011 so it has to
made up elsewhere. I haven't located the 2013 numbers
but I would be _highly_ surprised if IBM doesn't use the occasion of the
first z/OS version change in 13 years to raise prices
It's awfully late in the game to announce a price increase. One would hope that
would have been done when 2.1 was previewed.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
On 5/21/2013 10:35 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
but I would be _highly_ surprised if IBM doesn't use the occasion of the first
z/OS version change in 13 years to raise prices
It's awfully late in the game to announce a price increase. One would hope that
would have been done when 2.1 was previewed.
but I would be _highly_ surprised if IBM doesn't use the occasion of
the first z/OS version change in 13 years to raise prices
It's awfully late in the game to announce a price increase. One would hope
that would have been done when 2.1 was previewed.
Generally, I don't think announcement
In
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e628c16e53...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se,
on 05/20/2013
at 03:33 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said:
The implied target for the FTINCL is the ISPFILE dataset that is
preallocated.
Why? Allocate one yourself that is big enough, or use FTOPEN TEMP if
I viewed the leap seconds problem as a correct answer. I viewed the tool as
converting the STCK value mathematically to a readable value, not as
accounting for all of the various adjustments.
They should make it clear on the Web site which they are doing.
Charles
-Original Message-
In
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e628c16e53...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se,
on 05/20/2013
at 05:25 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said:
As I described at the ISPF-L list, this didn't work. And that's
because ISPF uses an userid.ISPn.SPFTEMPn.WORK file just for file
tailoring into
Carlos-
Found an old manual- - - - Here is my correction:
HOME 201.65.37.235 MANLCS0
DEVICE MAN250 LCS 250
LINK MANLCS0 ETHERNET 0 MAN250
GATEWAY
;
I'm not sure I understand your last question ... but let me try to clarify a
couple of things.
It's important to realize that you have two separate pieces of crypto hardware
available on System z:
the CPACF for symmetric clear key and hashing operations and
the Crypto Express card for symmetric
I am looking for a simple process that will give me
Date UCB #count Logrec Entry
2013-05-21 1A23 226 OBR (LONG)
Information. Is there something that will do this? I just need tallies.
Maybe time if I want to graph it over a 24 hour period.
I can run EREP to get
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Bob Shannon
bshan...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
Generally, I don't think announcement previews include pricing information.
Usually, only official announcements have that.
The salient point is that customers need to know of price increases in
advance of GA. If
On Tue, 21 May 2013 10:41:39 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 10:06:12 -0500, Bill Godfrey wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 08:24:41 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
Also, thanks for your STCK(E) converter.
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/toolsTOD.php Have used that from time to
If you look in your HSM Storage Administration manual, the chapter titled
Using the LIST Command shows that dump generation numbers are produced by
LIST VOLUME, not LIST COPYPOOL. It is on page 1355 in my 1.11 version of
the manual.
If you have a particular primary volume (ML0) in mind, you
In
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e628c16e53...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se,
on 05/20/2013
at 09:25 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said:
=== I think that part of this disagreement is that most of my
opponents here is, more or less, sysprogs. And as such they haven't
experienced the
Bernard,
We make use of the Monitor III Batch Address Space Reporter and
produce wto's to show us our Group Capacity usage. An example:
+RMF300I 3B: Processing CPC Report...
+MVS1 - RMF301I: 4H Average: 2
+MVS1 - RMF302I: 4H Max: 3
This is something interesting to me and I am also looking for the same. I
am learning and exploring REXX. I like to have the help in displaying two
items - 1. Total % Weight: and 2, WLM Capping %: 0.0. 3. A specific
time the LPAR is capped using CVT, RMCT and RCT Storage search. Kindly
Hello Suresh, yoiu will find the doc here :
z/OS V1R13.0 TSO/E REXX Reference: 1.0
Document Number: SA22-7790-10
The Rexx is exactly what I want to use, I just dont kwno where is the info in
storage for the capped status.
Otherwise Lpar weights, machine info are ok.
Bernard
Hello Roger,
In fact I'am using the rexx LPINFOX but the capped status when using group
capacity is not accurate.
/**/
/**/
/* Name: LPINFOX
55 matches
Mail list logo
